Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22588281›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2012

A microfluidic device for whole-animal drug screening using electrophysiological measures in the nematode C. elegans.

Shawn R Lockery, S Elizabeth Hulme, William M Roberts, Kristin J Robinson, Anna Laromaine, Theodore H Lindsay, George M Whitesides, Janis C Weeks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. eLife · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. UnravelingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn R LockeryInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1254, USA. shawn@uoregon.edu
S Elizabeth Hulme
William M Roberts
Kristin J Robinson
Anna Laromaine
Theodore H Lindsay
George M Whitesides
Janis C Weeks
University of Oregon · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Microfluidic devices for high-throughput anthelmintic screensRC1AI087059 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 2009 to 2010
$760k
NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI087059NIAID NIH HHS RC1AI087059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the fabrication and use of a microfluidic device for performing whole-animal chemical screens using non-invasive electrophysiological readouts of neuromuscular function in the nematode worm, C. elegans. The device consists of an array of microchannels to which electrodes are attached to form recording modules capable of detecting the electrical activity of the pharynx, a heart-like neuromuscular organ involved in feeding. The array is coupled to a tree-like arrangement of distribution channels that automatically delivers one nematode to each recording module. The same channels are then used to perfuse the recording modules with test solutions while recording the electropharyngeogram (EPG) from each worm with sufficient sensitivity to detect each pharyngeal contraction. The device accurately reported the acute effects of known anthelmintics (anti-nematode drugs) and also correctly distinguished a specific drug-resistant mutant strain of C. elegans from wild type. The approach described here is readily adaptable to parasitic species for the identification of novel anthelmintics. It is also applicable in toxicology and drug discovery programs for human metabolic and degenerative diseases for which C. elegans is used as a model.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnthelminticsCaenorhabditis elegansDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalElectrophysiological PhenomenaIvermectinLevamisoleMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesWhole Body ImagingAnthelminticsIvermectinLevamisole

Identifiers

PMID22588281
PMCPMC3372093
OpenAlexW2168720880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.