Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22588214›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2012

Interpreting variability in population biomonitoring data: role of elimination kinetics.

Lesa L Aylward, Chris R Kirman, John L Adgate, Lisa M McKenzie, Sean M Hays

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Consistency of Biomarkers of Exposure in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study from Samples Taken 3 to 5 Years Apart.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  4. Identifying differences in U.S. exposure to ubiquitous carcinogens.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Year-to-year variation in phthalate metabolites in the Midlife Women's Health Study.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of Half-life and Smoking/Nonsmoking Ratio on Biomarker Consistency between Waves 1 and 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bayesian inference of chemical exposures from NHANES urine biomonitoring data.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. New Approach Methodologies for Exposure Science.Current opinion in toxicology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lesa L AylwardSummit Toxicology, LLP, Falls Church, VA 22044, USA. laylward@summittoxicology.com
Chris R Kirman
John L Adgate
Lisa M McKenzie
Sean M Hays
Colorado School of Public Health · USSummit School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker concentrations in spot samples of blood and urine are implicitly interpreted as direct surrogates for long-term exposure magnitude in a variety of contexts including (1) epidemiological studies of potential health outcomes associated with general population chemical exposure, and (2) cross-sectional population biomonitoring studies. However, numerous factors in addition to exposure magnitude influence biomarker concentrations in spot samples, including temporal variation in spot samples because of elimination kinetics. The influence of half-life of elimination relative to exposure interval is examined here using simple first-order pharmacokinetic simulations of urinary concentrations in spot samples collected at random times relative to exposure events. Repeated exposures were modeled for each individual in the simulation with exposure amounts drawn from lognormal distributions with varying geometric standard deviations. Relative variation in predicted spot sample concentrations was greater than the variation in underlying dose distributions when the half-life of elimination was shorter than the interval between exposures, with the degree of relative variation increasing as the ratio of half-life to exposure interval decreased. Results of the modeling agreed well with data from a serial urine collection data set from the Centers for Disease Control. Data from previous studies examining intra-class correlation coefficients for a range of chemicals relying upon repeated sampling support the importance of considering the half-life relative to exposure frequency in design and interpretation of studies using spot samples for exposure classification and exposure estimation. The modeling and data sets presented here provide tools that can assist in interpretation of variability in cross-sectional biomonitoring studies and in design of studies utilizing biomonitoring data as markers for exposure.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPopulation SurveillanceHumansPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID22588214
OpenAlexW1975278258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.