Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22587425›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

André L Mihaljevic, Christoph W Michalski, Mert Erkan, Carolin Reiser-Erkan, Carsten Jäger, Tibor Schuster, Christoph Schuhmacher, Jörg Kleeff, Helmut Friess

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03170843 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Efficacy of a Sterile Circular Polyethylene Drape Compared to Conventional Surgical Dressing in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03170843 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Efficacy of a Sterile Circular Polyethylene Drape Compared to Conventional Surgical Dressing in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaint Vincent's Hospital, KoreaRan2017 to 2022Enrolled457ConditionsSurgical Wound InfectionArmsuse of plastic ring wound retractor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Response: don't give up on wound protectors yet.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

André L MihaljevicDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Christoph W Michalski
Mert Erkan
Carolin Reiser-Erkan
Carsten Jäger
Tibor Schuster
Christoph Schuhmacher
Jörg Kleeff
Helmut Friess
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infection rates warrant further investigation and evaluation in randomized controlled trials. METHODS/

designTo investigate whether the application of a circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of surgical site infections in general and visceral surgical patients that undergo midline or transverse laparotomy by 50%. BaFO is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded and observer-blinded multicenter clinical trial with two parallel surgical groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 45 days postoperative assessed according to the definition of the Center for Disease Control. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5% (2 sided) and sample size (n = 258 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80% with a planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint after the inclusion of 340 patients. DISCUSSION: The BaFO trial will explore if the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by a single, simple, inexpensive intervention in patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAbdomenBandagesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePolyethyleneSurgical Wound InfectionPolyethylene

Identifiers

PMID22587425
PMCPMC3533734
OpenAlexW2114983792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.