Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22587415›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2012

Longitudinal Evaluation of Transition Services ("LETS Study"): protocol for outcome evaluation.

Irina Tsybina, Shauna Kingsnorth, Joanne Maxwell, Mark Bayley, Sally Lindsay, Patricia McKeever, Angela Colantonio, Yani Hamdani, Helen Healy, Colin Macarthur

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00975338 (The LETS Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00975338 completednot on this map

The LETS Study: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Transition Services

TypeobservationalSponsorHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalRan2009 to 2016Enrolled149ConditionsCerebral Palsy, Brain Injuries, Spinal DysraphismArmsLIFEspan, Non-LIFEspan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Irina TsybinaBloorview Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Shauna Kingsnorth
Joanne Maxwell
Mark Bayley
Sally Lindsay
Patricia McKeever
Angela Colantonio
Yani Hamdani
Helen Healy
Colin Macarthur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of advances in medical treatment, most children with physical disabilities can expect to achieve near normal life spans. Typically, coordinated teams of health care providers in specialized pediatric settings care for these children. As these children reach adulthood, however, the availability of services and expertise changes because the adult health care system has different processes designed to meet their specialized needs. Gaps in continuity of care during the transition from pediatric to adult services, and associated poor health outcomes are well documented. In response, new models of care are being introduced to address the complex process of health care transition. This paper describes a study protocol of a client-centred, prospective, longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation of linked model of health care across the lifespan (the LIFEspan Model), offered by a pediatric rehabilitation centre and an adult rehabilitation centre.

methodThis project will include a process and an outcome evaluation of the LIFEspan Model. The process evaluation will detail the specific service delivery that occurs with respect to preparation for transition and transfer of care through chart audits of pediatric medical records and qualitative interviews with LIFEspan staff. The outcome evaluation will measure the effect of the model on: 1) maintaining continuity within the health care system from pediatric to adult care; and 2) secondary outcomes related to health, well-being, social participation, transition readiness, and health care utilization of youth with cerebral palsy and acquired brain injury. Standardized instruments will include Health Utilities Inventory, Assessment of Life Habits, Arc's Self-Determination, Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life, Partners in Health Questionnaire, Social Support Questionnaire, and Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease. DISCUSSION: The LETS study will be original in its undertaking of a prospective examination of outcomes 1-year post-transition, use of multiple comparison groups, and absence of disability-related exclusion criteria ensuring that the transition experiences of varied populations of young people and their families will be represented.

trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT00975338.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdolescentBrain InjuriesCerebral PalsyHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesTransition to Adult CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22587415
PMCPMC3496583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.