Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22586535›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional gastroenterology2011

Feasibility of colonoscopy with water infusion in minimally sedated patients in an Asian Community Setting.

Yu-Hsi Hsieh, Kuo-Chih Tseng, Jin-Jian Hsieh, Chih-Wei Tseng, Tsung-Hsing Hung, Felix W Leung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Water-Assisted Colonoscopy.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Response to Feuerstein.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The water exchange method for colonoscopy-effect of coaching.Journal of interventional gastroenterology · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Hsi HsiehDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chih Tseng
Jin-Jian Hsieh
Chih-Wei Tseng
Tsung-Hsing Hung
Felix W Leung
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigators in the US described large volume water infusion with marked benefits but acknowledged the limitation of male veteran predominance in the study subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of large volume water infusion in Asian patients undergoing minimal sedation diagnostic colonoscopy in a community setting.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized to receive large volume (entire colon) (Group A, n=51), limited volume (rectum and sigmoid colon) (Group B, n=51) water infusion, or air insufflation (Group C, n=51). Pain during insertion, completion rate, cecal intubation and total procedure times, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Pain and satisfaction were assessed with a 0-10 visual analog scale.

resultsThe mean pain scores during insertion were lower in the Group A and Group B than in Group C, 3.3±2.4, 3.0±2.2 and 4.4±2.6, respectively (p=0.028 and p=0.004). The completion rates and cecal intubation times were similar among the three groups. The procedure time was significantly longer in Group A than in group C (15.3±5.9 min vs. 13.1±5.4 min, p=0.049). Overall satisfaction with the procedure was greater in Group B than in Group C only (9.7±0.5 vs. 9.4±0.8, p=0.044).

conclusionsDiagnostic colonoscopy with large volume water infusion without air insufflation appears to be feasible in minimally sedated Asian patients in a community setting. Measures to improve the outcome further are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID22586535
PMCPMC3350893
OpenAlexW1974452775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.