Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22586471›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Patrilineal perspective on the Austronesian diffusion in Mainland Southeast Asia.

Jun-Dong He, Min-Sheng Peng, Huy Ho Quang, Khoa Pham Dang, An Vu Trieu, Shi-Fang Wu, Jie-Qiong Jin, Robert W Murphy, Yong-Gang Yao, Ya-Ping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The paternal and maternal genetic history of Vietnamese populations.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unravelling the distinct strains of Tharu ancestry.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014
    Article
  8. Retrieving Y chromosomal haplogroup trees using GWAS data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun-Dong HeState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Min-Sheng Peng
Huy Ho Quang
Khoa Pham Dang
An Vu Trieu
Shi-Fang Wu
Jie-Qiong Jin
Robert W Murphy
Yong-Gang Yao
Ya-Ping Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cham people are the major Austronesian speakers of Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) and the reconstruction of the Cham population history can provide insights into their diffusion. In this study, we analyzed non-recombining region of the Y chromosome markers of 177 unrelated males from four populations in MSEA, including 59 Cham, 76 Kinh, 25 Lao, and 17 Thai individuals. Incorporating published data from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), our results indicated that, in general, the Chams are an indigenous Southeast Asian population. The origin of the Cham people involves the genetic admixture of the Austronesian immigrants from Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) with the local populations in MSEA. Discordance between the overall patterns of Y chromosome and mtDNA in the Chams is evidenced by the presence of some Y chromosome lineages that prevail in South Asians. Our results suggest that male-mediated dispersals via the spread of religions and business trade might play an important role in shaping the patrilineal gene pool of the Cham people.

Indexed as

Gene PoolAsian PeopleAsia, SoutheasternChromosomes, Human, YDNA, MitochondrialEmigration and ImmigrationGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHumansMalePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID22586471
PMCPMC3346718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.