ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2012
Divisive normalization and neuronal oscillations in a single hierarchical framework of selective visual attention.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature interference underlies a neuronal basis for the behavioral cost of task uncertainty.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Gamma-band synchronization between neurons in the visual cortex is causal for effective information processing and behavior.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Signal switching may enhance processing power of the brain.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024Review
- Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Sparse identification of contrast gain control in the fruit fly photoreceptor and amacrine cell layer.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- A model for attentional information routing through coherence predicts biased competition and multistable perception.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- On event-based optical flow detection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Article
- A unifying mechanistic model of selective attention in spiking neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Review
- Network dynamics predict improvement in working memory performance following donepezil administration in healthy young adults.NeuroImage · 2014Article
- Population coding in mouse visual cortex: response reliability and dissociability of stimulus tuning and noise correlation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Divisive normalization models of covert attention commonly use spike rate modulations as indicators of the effect of top-down attention. In addition, an increasing number of studies have shown that top-down attention increases the synchronization of neuronal oscillations as well, particularly in gamma-band frequencies (25-100 Hz). Although modulations of spike rate and synchronous oscillations are not mutually exclusive as mechanisms of attention, there has thus far been little effort to integrate these concepts into a single framework of attention. Here, we aim to provide such a unified framework by expanding the normalization model of attention with a multi-level hierarchical structure and a time dimension; allowing the simulation of a recently reported backward progression of attentional effects along the visual cortical hierarchy. A simple cascade of normalization models simulating different cortical areas is shown to cause signal degradation and a loss of stimulus discriminability over time. To negate this degradation and ensure stable neuronal stimulus representations, we incorporate a kind of oscillatory phase entrainment into our model that has previously been proposed as the "communication-through-coherence" (CTC) hypothesis. Our analysis shows that divisive normalization and oscillation models can complement each other in a unified account of the neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. The resulting hierarchical normalization and oscillation (HNO) model reproduces several additional spatial and temporal aspects of attentional modulation and predicts a latency effect on neuronal responses as a result of cued attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.