Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22586331›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2012

The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis.

Luciola da C Menezes Costa, Christopher G Maher, Mark J Hancock, James H McAuley, Robert D Herbert, Leonardo O P Costa

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 239 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed, 27 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05005416 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Based Physical Therapy Intervention for Latinos With Chronic Spine Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled138ConditionsLow Back Pain, Neck Pain, Chronic Pain, Chronic Low-back PainArmsGOALS Intervention, Usual Care Physical Therapy
NCT05706103 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Specific Skilled Motor Versus General Exercise Training on Peripheral Muscle and Central Brain Alterations in Patients with Recurrent Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2021 to 2025Enrolled62ConditionsLow Back Pain, RecurrentArmsSpecific skilled motor training, General extension training
NCT07696741 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Nociplastic PainArmsPain Reprocessing Therapy, Monitoring and Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 636 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. The clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Psychometric properties of chronic low back pain diagnostic classification systems: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  15. Isokinetic Trunk Strength in Acute Low Back Pain Patients Compared to Healthy Subjects: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  16. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  17. Reduction mammoplasty and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luciola da C Menezes CostaGeorge Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher G Maher
Mark J Hancock
James H McAuley
Robert D Herbert
Leonardo O P Costa
Macquarie University · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUNeuroscience Research Australia · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough low-back pain is a highly prevalent condition, its clinical course remains uncertain. Our main objective was to systematically review the literature on the clinical course of pain and disability in patients with acute and persistent low-back pain. Our secondary objective was to investigate whether pain and disability have similar courses.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of inception cohort studies. We identified eligible studies by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. We included prospective studies that enrolled an episode-inception cohort of patients with acute or persistent low-back pain and that measured pain, disability or recovery. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodologic quality. We used mixed models to determine pooled estimates of pain and disability over time.

resultsData from 33 discrete cohorts (11 166 participants) were included in the review. The variance-weighted mean pain score (out of a maximum score of 100) was 52 (95% CI 48-57) at baseline, 23 (95% CI 21-25) at 6 weeks, 12 (95% CI 9-15) at 26 weeks and 6 (95% CI 3-10) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain for cohorts with acute pain. Among cohorts with persistent pain, the variance-weighted mean pain score (out of 100) was 51 (95% CI 44-59) at baseline, 33 (95% CI 29-38) at 6 weeks, 26 (95% CI 20-33) at 26 weeks and 23 (95% CI 16-30) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain. The course of disability outcomes was similar to the time course of pain outcomes in the acute pain cohorts, but the pain outcomes were slightly worse than disability outcomes in the persistent pain cohorts.

interpretationPatients who presented with acute or persistent low-back pain improved markedly in the first six weeks. After that time improvement slowed. Low to moderate levels of pain and disability were still present at one year, especially in the cohorts with persistent pain.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationQuality of LifeAcute PainChronic PainHumansLow Back PainPersons with DisabilitiesPrognosisRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22586331
PMCPMC3414626
OpenAlexW2141058036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.