Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22586222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2012

Three-dimensional mechanisms of increased vulnerability to electric shocks in myocardial infarction: altered virtual electrode polarizations and conduction delay in the peri-infarct zone.

Lukas J Rantner, Hermenegild J Arevalo, Jason L Constantino, Igor R Efimov, Gernot Plank, Natalia A Trayanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Images as drivers of progress in cardiac computational modelling.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas J RantnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Hermenegild J Arevalo
Jason L Constantino
Igor R Efimov
Gernot Plank
Natalia A Trayanova

Funding

Virtual Electrode Polarization Hypothesis of DefibrillationR01HL067322 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EFIMOV, IGOR R · 2001 to 2010
$3.7M
Resynchronizing the Failing Heart: Insights from a Multiscale Cardiac ModelR01HL103428 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
Defibrillation Mechanisms in Infarcted HeartsR01HL082729 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
Multi-scale Modeling of Calcium Mediated Triggered Activity in the HeartR01HL101196 · NHLBI · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE · PI SHIFERAW, YOHANNES · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Image-based models that predict arrhythmia morphology in post-infarction heartsF31HL099275 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AREVALO, HERMENEGILD JAVIER · 2010 to 2012
$125k
Image-based models of electromechanics in normal and failing heartsF31HL103090 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CONSTANTINO, JASON LANCE · 2010 to 2012
$125k
Austrian Science Fund FWF F 3210NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL099275NHLBI NIH HHS F31-HL099275NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL103090NHLBI NIH HHS F31-HL103090NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067322NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL067322NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL082729NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL082729NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL101196NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defibrillation efficacy is decreased in infarcted hearts, but the mechanisms by which infarcted hearts are more vulnerable to electric shocks than healthy hearts remain poorly understood. The goal of this study was to provide insight into the 3D mechanisms for the increased vulnerability to electric shocks in infarcted hearts. We hypothesized that changes in virtual electrode polarizations (VEPs) and propagation delay through the peri-infarct zone (PZ) were responsible. We developed a micro anatomically detailed rabbit ventricular model with chronic myocardial infarction from magnetic resonance imaging and enriched the model with data from optical mapping experiments. We further developed a control model without the infarct. The simulation protocol involved apical pacing followed by biphasic shocks. Simulation results from both models were compared.The upper limit of vulnerability(ULV) was 8 V cm(-1) in the infarction model and 4 V cm(-1) in the control model. VEPs were less pronounced in the infarction model, providing a larger excitable area for postshock propagation but smaller transmembrane potential gradients to initiate new wavefronts. Initial post-shock transmural activation occurred at a later time in the infarction model, and the PZ served to delay propagation in subsequent beats. The presence of the PZ was found to be responsible for the increased vulnerability.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockModels, CardiovascularAnimalsComputer SimulationElectrodesHeart Conduction SystemMyocardial InfarctionRabbits

Identifiers

PMID22586222
PMCPMC3477756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.