Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22586094›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Macaque studies of vaccine and microbicide combinations for preventing HIV-1 sexual transmission.

Dan H Barouch, Per Johan Klasse, Jason Dufour, Ronald S Veazey, John P Moore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rectal pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).Antiviral research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dan H BarouchBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA. dbarouch@bidmc.harvard.edu
Per Johan Klasse
Jason Dufour
Ronald S Veazey
John P Moore
Cornell University · USTulane University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Adenovirus Prime-Boost HIV-1 VaccineU19AI078526 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOLIN, RAPHAEL · 2008 to 2012
$44.0M
Testing practical microbicides in macaquesU19AI076982 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI VEAZEY, RONALD S. · 2008 to 2012
$7.9M
Novel Adenovirus Vaccine Vectors for HIV/SIVR01AI066924 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2006 to 2010
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI066924NIAID NIH HHS AI078526NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066924NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076982NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI078526NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI76982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination and the application of a vaginal microbicide have traditionally been considered independent methods to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1 to women. Both techniques can be effective in macaque models, and limited efficacy has been observed in clinical trials for each. Here, we have addressed whether vaccines and microbicides can be used together to provide reinforced protection against virus challenge of rhesus macaques. In two separate experiments, four groups of animals were vaccinated with a T-cell-based adenovirus (Ad) vectored vaccine aimed at reducing postinfection viral loads and/or a partially effective dose of a vaginal microbicide aimed at blocking infection of a high-dose vaginal challenge with SIVmac251 or SHIV-162P3. In the first study, the only two protected animals were in the group that received Ad26/Ad5HVR48 vaccine vectors combined with the fusion inhibitor T-1249 as the vaginal microbicide before SIVmac251 challenge. In the second study, vaccination with Ad35/Ad26 vectors combined with the CCR5 inhibitor maraviroc as the vaginal microbicide led to significant reductions of both acquisition of infection and postinfection viral loads following SHIV-SF162P3 challenge. As expected, the vaccine by itself reduced viral loads but had no acquisition effect, whereas the microbicide had a partial acquisition effect but minimal impact on viral loads. For both measures of protective efficacy, the vaccine-microbicide combination differed more from controls than did either separate intervention. Overall, the data suggest that vaccines and microbicides are complementary techniques that may protect better when used together than separately.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsCyclohexanesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV-1HIV Fusion InhibitorsHIV InfectionsHumansMacaca mulattaMaravirocRNA, ViralSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAIDS VaccinesAnti-Infective AgentsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsCyclohexanesHIV Fusion InhibitorsMaravirocRNA, ViralTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22586094
PMCPMC3365197
OpenAlexW1993941418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.