Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22585941›Full record

ArticleToxicologic pathology2012

Gender differences in chemical carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-year bioassays.

Sandeep Kadekar, Shyamal Peddada, Ilona Silins, John E French, Johan Högberg, Ulla Stenius

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicologic pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandeep KadekarInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shyamal Peddada
Ilona Silins
John E French
Johan Högberg
Ulla Stenius
Karolinska Institutet · SENational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

NIEHS Statistical Consulting ServiceZIAES045005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEDDADA, SHYAMAL · 2009 to 2011
$2.8M
NIEHS STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICEZ01ES045005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEDDADA, SHYAMAL · 1997 to 2008
$741k
Collaborative research in environmental health sciencesZIAES103066 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEDDADA, SHYAMAL · 2012 to 2017
$732k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES045005NIEHS NIH HHS ES045005-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database for sex differences in rat responses to chemical carcinogens. We found that the odds that male rat bioassays were assigned a higher level of evidence than female rat bioassays was 1.69 (p < .001). Of 278 carcinogenic chemicals in the database, 201 (72%) exhibited statistical gender differences (p ≤ .05) in at least one nonreproductive organ. One hundred thirty of these 201 chemicals induced gender-specific tumors in male rats and 59 in female rats. Sixty-eight chemicals induced tumors in males but no tumors in females. Less than one third (i.e., 19 chemicals) induced tumors in females but not males. Male-specific tumors included pancreatic and skin tumors, and female-specific tumors included lung tumors. For some tumor sites, these differences in gender susceptibility can be associated with literature data on sex hormone receptor expression. In conclusion, gender-specific tumors were common. The male dominance is in line with recent human data, and the male susceptibility to carcinogens should be further studied.

Indexed as

Carcinogenicity TestsAnimalsCarcinogensDisease SusceptibilityFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsNeoplasmsRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSex FactorsCarcinogens

Identifiers

PMID22585941
PMCPMC4778959
OpenAlexW2161482943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.