Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22584512›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2012

Youth researching youth: benefits, limitations and ethical considerations within a participatory research process.

Cynthia G Jardine, Angela James

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Crisis-Resilient and Antiracist Approaches to Community-Based Participatory Research During COVID-19 and Beyond.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: Practical recommendations for researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Review
  15. "In Their Own Voice"-Incorporating Underlying Social Determinants into Aboriginal Health Promotion Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia G JardineSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. cindy.jardine@ualberta.ca
Angela James

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the benefits, limitations and ethical issues associated with conducting participatory research on tobacco use using youth to research other youth. STUDY

designCommunity-based participatory research.

methodsResearch on tobacco use was conducted with students in the K'àlemì Dene School and Kaw Tay Whee School in the Northwest Territories, Canada, using PhotoVoice. The Grade 9-12 students acted as researchers. Researcher reflections and observations were assessed using "member checking," whereby students, teachers and community partners could agree or disagree with the researcher's interpretation. The students and teachers were further asked informally to share their own reflections and observations on this process. RESULTS AND

conclusionsUsing youth to research other youth within a participatory research framework had many benefits for the quality of the research, the youth researchers and the community. The research was perceived by the researchers and participants to be more valid and credible. The approach was more appropriate for the students, and the youth researchers gained valuable research experience and a sense of ownership of both the research process and results. Viewing smoking through their children's eyes was seen by the community to be a powerful and effective means of creating awareness of the community environment. Limitations of the approach were residual response bias of participants, the short period of time to conduct the research and failure to fully explore student motivations to smoke or not to smoke. Ethical considerations included conducting research with minors, difficulties in obtaining written parental consent, decisions on cameras (disposable versus digital) and representation of all participants in the final research product.

Indexed as

Ethics, MedicalAdolescentChildCohort StudiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansIndians, North AmericanInterviews as TopicNorthwest TerritoriesResearch PersonnelSchoolsSmokingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22584512
PMCPMC3417519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.