Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22584382›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2012

Automated photoplethysmography-based determination of ankle-brachial index: a validation study against Doppler sonography.

Frank Beutner, Andrej Teren, Stephan Gielen, Gerhard Schuler, Kerstin Wirkner, Daniel Tiller, Markus Loeffler, Markus Scholz

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Automated plethysmographic measurement of the ankle-brachial index: a comparison with the doppler ultrasound method.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2016
    Article
  12. The value of noncoronary atherosclerosis for identifying coronary artery disease: results of the Leipzig LIFE Heart Study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank BeutnerLIFE-Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. frank.beutner@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Andrej Teren
Stephan Gielen
Gerhard Schuler
Kerstin Wirkner
Daniel Tiller
Markus Loeffler
Markus Scholz
Leipzig University · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetermination of ankle-brachial-index (ABI) by manual Doppler is well established to screen for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and to predict cardiovascular risk. A new generation of digital-controlled devices promises automated ABI determination. The aim of this study was to determine comparability of automated photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived ABI calculation with the Doppler-ABI algorithm commonly used in cohort studies.

methodsAutomated PPG-based ABI measurements [Vascular Explorer (VE) and Vicorder (VI)] were recorded from 112 limbs of healthy subjects and 22 limbs of patients with confirmed LEAD. Validity was evaluated on the basis of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of clinical status and concordance with Doppler-ABI. Differences between cuff inflation [inf]- and deflation [def]-based method were studied in VE.

resultsPPG-based ABI values were higher compared to Doppler-ABI (VI +0.06, VEinf +0.15, VEdef +0.09, p < 0.001, respectively). The difference was pronounced in pathological (<0.9), borderline (0.9-0.99) and low normal (1.0-1.09) ABI, but less in ABI ≥1.1. However, ROC analysis revealed excellent diagnostic value for LEAD (sensitivity/specificity) and comparable area under the curve at method-adapted ABI thresholds for all methods: Doppler (95/90 %, 0.95), VI (75/96 %, 0.91), VEinf (85/89 %, 0.93) and VEdef (80/98 %, 0.94).

conclusionsDigital-controlled PPG-based ABI determination is a useful diagnostic application for LEAD. However, the systematic higher ABI in PPG-based measurement compared to Doppler and remarkable differences between the deflationary and inflationary method are critical for the interpretation of borderline and low normal ABI values where precise reading is essential to detect mild LEAD and subclinical disease and to predict cardiovascular risk.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyUltrasonography, DopplerAgedAlgorithmsAnkle Brachial IndexArea Under CurveAutomation, LaboratoryCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePredictive Value of TestsRadiography

Identifiers

PMID22584382
OpenAlexW2018441974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.