Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22584093›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior2012

Small retailer perspectives of the 2009 Women, Infants and Children Program food package changes.

Joel Gittelsohn, Melissa N Laska, Tatiana Andreyeva, Gary Foster, Donald Rose, June Tester, Seung Hee Lee, Shannon N Zenk, Angela Odoms-Young, Tara McCoy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joel GittelsohnCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jgittels@jhsph.edu
Melissa N Laska
Tatiana Andreyeva
Gary Foster
Donald Rose
June Tester
Seung Hee Lee
Shannon N Zenk
Angela Odoms-Young
Tara McCoy
Guadalupe X Ayala

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER AT TULANE UNIVERSITY (CATEGORY 1)U48DP001948 · DP · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JOHNSON, CAROLYN · 2009 to 2013
$5.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U48DP001948-02NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001948NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand vendor perspectives regarding changes made in 2009 to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) food package.

methodsFifty-two in-depth, qualitative interviews with owners or managers of small stores in 8 urban areas across 7 states conducted 6-12 months after the changes.

resultsStore owners experienced implementation challenges, but felt the changes increased the number of customers, sales, and profits.

conclusionThis research provides vendor perspectives on the 2009 WIC policy changes and may enhance policy implementation directed at increasing healthy food availability, particularly in urban communities.

Indexed as

CommerceNutrition PolicyAttitudeFoodHumansInterviews as TopicPolicy MakingPublic AssistanceUnited StatesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID22584093
PMCPMC4703098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.