Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22584059›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2012

BRCT domains: A little more than kin, and less than kind.

Dietlind L Gerloff, Nicholas T Woods, April A Farago, Alvaro N A Monteiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An additional proofreader contributes to DNA replication fidelity in mycobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Functional Impacts of the BRCA1-mTORC2 Interaction in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. BRCT-domain protein BRIT1 influences class switch recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dietlind L GerloffDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Nicholas T Woods
April A Farago
Alvaro N A Monteiro

Funding

SPORE in Lung CancerP50CA119997 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GABRILOVICH, DMITRY I · 2008 to 2012
$11.0M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA119997NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCT domains are versatile protein modular domains found as single units or as multiple copies in more than 20 different proteins in the human genome. Interestingly, most BRCT-containing proteins function in the same biological process, the DNA damage response network, but show specificity in their molecular interactions. BRCT domains have been found to bind a wide array of ligands from proteins, phosphorylated linear motifs, and DNA. Here we discuss the biology of BRCT domains and how a domain-centric analysis can aid in the understanding of signal transduction events in the DNA damage response network.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinComputer SimulationDNA DamageGenome, HumanHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationPhosphorylationPhylogenyProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsBRCA1 ProteinLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22584059
PMCPMC3413754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.