ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
SIS: a program to generate draft genome sequence scaffolds for prokaryotes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Draft Genomic Sequences of Streptomyces misionensis ACT66 and Streptomyces albidoflavus ACT77, Bacteria with Potential Application for Phytopathogen Biocontrol.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Rapid genetic and phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains during ventilator-associated pneumonia.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Multi-CSAR: a multiple reference-based contig scaffolder using algebraic rearrangements.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Draft Genome Sequences of the 1,2-Dichloropropane-Respiring Dehalococcoides mccartyi Strains RC and KS.Microbiology resource announcements · 2018Article
- CSAR-web: a web server of contig scaffolding using algebraic rearrangements.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Phylogenetic signal from rearrangements in 18 Anopheles species by joint scaffolding extant and ancestral genomes.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Closed Genome Sequence of Phytopathogen Biocontrol AgentGenome announcements · 2018Article
- Genomic repeats, misassembly and reannotation: a case study with long-read resequencing of Porphyromonas gingivalis reference strains.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Multi-CAR: a tool of contig scaffolding using multiple references.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Genome sequence and plasmid transformation of the model high-yield bacterial cellulose producer Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 53582.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Identification and monitoring of nitrification and denitrification genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae EGD-HP19-C for its ability to perform heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification.Functional & integrative genomics · 2015Article
- CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis Strain T01-328, a Brazilian Isolate That Produces a Soluble Pesticide Protein, Cry1Ia.Genome announcements · 2013Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of the Brazilian Toxic Bloom-Forming Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa Strain SPC777.Genome announcements · 2013Article
- Assembling contigs in draft genomes using reversals and block-interchanges.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- The genome sequence of Dyella jiangningensis FCAV SCS01 from a lignocellulose-decomposing microbial consortium metagenome reveals potential for biotechnological applications.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
- Approaches for in silico finishing of microbial genome sequences.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecreasing costs of DNA sequencing have made prokaryotic draft genome sequences increasingly common. A contig scaffold is an ordering of contigs in the correct orientation. A scaffold can help genome comparisons and guide gap closure efforts. One popular technique for obtaining contig scaffolds is to map contigs onto a reference genome. However, rearrangements that may exist between the query and reference genomes may result in incorrect scaffolds, if these rearrangements are not taken into account. Large-scale inversions are common rearrangement events in prokaryotic genomes. Even in draft genomes it is possible to detect the presence of inversions given sufficient sequencing coverage and a sufficiently close reference genome.
resultsWe present a linear-time algorithm that can generate a set of contig scaffolds for a draft genome sequence represented in contigs given a reference genome. The algorithm is aimed at prokaryotic genomes and relies on the presence of matching sequence patterns between the query and reference genomes that can be interpreted as the result of large-scale inversions; we call these patterns inversion signatures. Our algorithm is capable of correctly generating a scaffold if at least one member of every inversion signature pair is present in contigs and no inversion signatures have been overwritten in evolution. The algorithm is also capable of generating scaffolds in the presence of any kind of inversion, even though in this general case there is no guarantee that all scaffolds in the scaffold set will be correct. We compare the performance of sis, the program that implements the algorithm, to seven other scaffold-generating programs. The results of our tests show that sis has overall better performance.
conclusionssis is a new easy-to-use tool to generate contig scaffolds, available both as stand-alone and as a web server. The good performance of sis in our tests adds evidence that large-scale inversions are widespread in prokaryotic genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.