SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2012
The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The global prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in pregnant women: a meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: systematic reviews on effectiveness and patient preferences.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Cervical Cancer Induction Enhancement Potential of Chlamydia Trachomatis: A Systematic Review.Current microbiology · 2018Pooled it
- Prevalence of chlamydia trachomatis infection among reproductive age women in sub Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Pooled it
- A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis on Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Iranian women (1986-2015).Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pathogens and global health · 2015Pooled it
- Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2013Pooled it
- Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.BMC public health · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in females in São Paulo, Brazil: 11 years' surveillance of the infection.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- High Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted and Reproductive Tract Infections (STI/RTIs) among Patients Attending STI/Outpatient Department Clinics in Tanzania.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Incidence and Duration of Pharyngeal Chlamydia Among a Cohort of Men Who Have Sex With Men.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for DetectingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A systematic review of the prevalence of selected sexually transmitted infections in young people in Latin America.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- The prevalence of gonococcal and non-gonococcal infections in women referred to obstetrics and gynecology clinics.Le infezioni in medicina · 2022Article
- Prevalence ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis transmission between the oropharynx, urethra and anorectum in men who have sex with men: a mathematical model.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Evolving patterns of reactive arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Article
- The role of saliva in gonorrhoea and chlamydia transmission to extragenital sites among men who have sex with men: new insights into transmission.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Review
- Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: protocol for systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection in Australia. This report aims to measure the burden of chlamydia infection by systematically reviewing reports on prevalence in Australian populations.
methodsElectronic databases and conference websites were searched from 1997-2011 using the terms 'Chlamydia trachomatis' OR 'chlamydia' AND 'prevalence' OR 'epidemiology' AND 'Australia'. Reference lists were checked and researchers contacted for additional literature. Studies were categorised by setting and participants, and meta-analysis conducted to determine pooled prevalence estimates for each category.
resultsSeventy-six studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. There was a high level of heterogeneity between studies; however, there was a trend towards higher chlamydia prevalence in younger populations, Indigenous Australians, and those attending sexual health centres. In community or general practice settings, pooled prevalence for women <25 years in studies conducted post-2005 was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.1, 6.9; five studies), and for men <30 years over the entire review period was 3.9% (95% CI: 2.7, 5.1; six studies). For young Australians aged <25 years attending sexual health, family planning or youth clinics, estimated prevalence was 6.2% (95% CI: 5.1, 7.4; 10 studies) for women and 10.2% (95% CI: 9.5, 10.9; five studies) for men. Other key findings include pooled prevalence estimates of 22.1% (95% CI: 19.0, 25.3; three studies) for Indigenous women <25 years, 14.6% (95% CI: 11.5, 17.8; three studies) for Indigenous men <25 years, and 5.6% (95% CI: 4.8, 6.3; 11 studies) for rectal infection in men who have sex with men. Several studies failed to report basic demographic details such as sex and age, and were therefore excluded from the analysis.
conclusionsChlamydia trachomatis infections are a significant health burden in Australia; however, accurate estimation of chlamydia prevalence in Australian sub-populations is limited by heterogeneity within surveyed populations, and variations in sampling methodologies and data reporting. There is a need for more large, population-based studies and prospective cohort studies to compliment mandatory notification data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.