Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22583479›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2012

Induction of the neural crest state: control of stem cell attributes by gene regulatory, post-transcriptional and epigenetic interactions.

Maneeshi S Prasad, Tatjana Sauka-Spengler, Carole LaBonne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A dual role for GLI3 signaling in neural crest development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. From neural crest migration to the onset of gangliogenesis.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recognition of H2AK119ub plays an important role in RSF1-regulated earlyFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maneeshi S PrasadDept. of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Tatjana Sauka-Spengler
Carole LaBonne
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Transcriptional regulation of NC precursor formationR01CA114058 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LABONNE, CAROLE · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
Regulation of SoxE Function During Neural Crest FormationR01GM077288 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LABONNE, CAROLE · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
Unbiased discovery of Novel Regulators of the Cranial Neural CrestR21DE022150 · NIDCR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LABONNE, CAROLE · 2011 to 2012
$419k
Medical Research Council G0902418NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114058NCI NIH HHS R01CA114058NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE022150NIDCR NIH HHS R21DE022150NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077288NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM077288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural crest cells are a population of multipotent stem cell-like progenitors that arise at the neural plate border in vertebrates, migrate extensively, and give rise to diverse derivatives such as melanocytes, craniofacial cartilage and bone, smooth muscle, peripheral and enteric neurons and glia. The neural crest gene regulatory network (NC-GRN) includes a number of key factors that are used reiteratively to control multiple steps in the development of neural crest cells, including the acquisition of stem cell attributes. It is therefore essential to understand the mechanisms that control the distinct functions of such reiteratively used factors in different cellular contexts. The context-dependent control of neural crest specification is achieved through combinatorial interaction with other factors, post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications, and the epigenetic status and chromatin state of target genes. Here we review the current understanding of the NC-GRN, including the role of the neural crest specifiers, their links to the control of "stemness," and their dynamic context-dependent regulation during the formation of neural crest progenitors.

Indexed as

Embryonic InductionGene Regulatory NetworksMultipotent Stem CellsNeural CrestAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEpigenesis, GeneticProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID22583479
PMCPMC3354335
OpenAlexW2081121476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.