Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22583474›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and infection2012

Dose-specific efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

U K Griffiths, A Clark, B Gessner, A Miners, C Sanderson, E R Sedyaningsih, K E Mulholland

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and infection, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Infant protection from invasiveHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Adverse Events FollowingVaccines · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. National, regional, and provincial disease burden attributed toThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

U K GriffithsDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK. ulla.griffiths@lshtm.ac.uk
A Clark
B Gessner
A Miners
C Sanderson
E R Sedyaningsih
K E Mulholland
University of London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAgence de Médecine Préventive · FRMinistry of Health · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global coverage of infant Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccination has increased considerably during the past decade, partly due to GAVI Alliance donations of the vaccine to low-income countries. In settings where large numbers of children receive only one or two vaccine doses rather than the recommended three doses, dose-specific efficacy estimates are needed to predict impact. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine Hib vaccine efficacy against different clinical outcomes after receiving one, two or three doses of vaccine. Studies were eligible for inclusion if a prospective, controlled design had been used to evaluate commercially available Hib conjugate vaccines. Eight studies were included. Pooled vaccine efficacies against invasive Hib disease after one, two or three doses of vaccine were 59%, 92% and 93%, respectively. The meta-analysis provides robust estimates for use in decision-analytical models designed to predict the impact of Hib vaccine.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicHaemophilus VaccinesHumansImmunization ScheduleVaccines, ConjugateHaemophilus VaccinesVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID22583474
PMCPMC3404480
OpenAlexW2130258022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.