Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22582337›Full record

ReviewPsychosomatic medicine2012

Close relationships and health in daily life: a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms.

Gertraud Stadler, Kenzie A Snyder, Andrea B Horn, Patrick E Shrout, Niall P Bolger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychosomatic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social Support and Antibody Responses to Vaccination: A Meta-Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Automated Detection of Stressful Conversations Using Wearable Physiological and Inertial Sensors.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gertraud StadlerDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, 219 Schermerhorn Hall, 1190 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA. stadler@psych.columbia.edu
Kenzie A Snyder
Andrea B Horn
Patrick E Shrout
Niall P Bolger
Bridge University · SSColumbia University · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review research on close relationships and health in daily life, with a focus on physiological functioning and somatic symptoms, and to present data on the within-person effects of physical intimacy on somatic symptoms in committed couples' daily life. The empirical study tested whether prior change in physical intimacy predicted subsequent change in symptoms, over and above their concurrent association. In addition, the study tested if increasing and decreasing intimacy had asymmetric effects on symptom change.

methodsIn this study, 164 participants in 82 committed couples reported physical intimacy and somatic symptoms once a day for 33 days.

resultsPrior within-person change in intimacy predicted a subsequent reduction in symptoms; when a person's intimacy increased from one day to the next day, then symptoms decreased over the following days (B = -0.098, standard error [SE] = 0.038, p = .013). This lagged effect of intimacy held over and above the association of concurrent change in intimacy and symptoms (B = -0.122, SE = 0.041, p = .004). The study found asymmetric effects of prior increase and decrease in intimacy; prior intimacy increase predicted reduced subsequent symptoms (B = -0.189, SE = 0.068, p = .047), whereas prior intimacy decrease was unrelated to subsequent symptoms (B = -0.003, SE = 0.063, not significant). There was no evidence for asymmetric effects of intimacy increase and decrease on concurrent symptom change.

conclusionsClose relationships exert influences on health in daily life, and part of this influence is due to intimacy.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHealth StatusInterpersonal RelationsCausalityFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalProspective StudiesResearch DesignSexual BehaviorSomatoform DisordersTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22582337
OpenAlexW2315224177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.