Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22582336›Full record

ArticlePsychosomatic medicine2012

Expanding options for developing outcome measures from momentary assessment data.

Arthur A Stone, Joan E Broderick, Stefan Schneider, Joseph E Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosomatic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Multidimensional pain patterns in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal mobile health study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A comparison of in-the-moment and retrospective patient-reported outcome measures in advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Everyday-Life Social Contact on Pain.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arthur A StoneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Putnam Hall, South Campus, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8790, USA. arthur.stone@sunysb.edu
Joan E Broderick
Stefan Schneider
Joseph E Schwartz

Funding

Ecolog validity- patient-reported chronic disease*(RMI)U01AR052170 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI STONE, ARTHUR A · 2004 to 2008
$3.8M
Ecological Validity of PROMIS InstrumentsU01AR057948 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BRODERICK, JOAN E, STONE, ARTHUR A · 2009 to 2010
$2.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052170NIAMS NIH HHS U01-AR052170NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057948NIAMS NIH HHS U01-AR057948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe propose several different patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from momentary, real-time collection of symptom data. In addition to the mean of momentary reports of symptoms, other types of summaries can reflect different aspects of the symptom experience.

methodsWith secondary analyses of two studies of patients with chronic pain assessed with real-time methods, we demonstrate principles for developing outcomes that summarize symptom experience during a 1-week period. These studies focused on pain intensity, which is used to demonstrate methods for creating summary momentary measures.

resultsAnalyses from the first study (Pain 2008;139:146-57) yielded outcome measures based on the mean, median, 90th percentile, maximum, standard deviation, proportion of reports with no pain, proportion of reports with pain more than 50 (on a 0- to 100-point scale), and time-contingent measures. The second study examined the performance of these measures (and the mean) in a longitudinal study, in which some patients changed treatment (n = 78), making pain reduction likely, whereas others had no treatment change (n = 27). The measure that best discriminated the groups was the proportion of momentary reports without pain (effect size = 0.50), closely followed by the mean of all reports (effect size = 0.45). Most measures also correlated with patients' global impression of their change (between 0.39 and 0.55, except for standard deviation [0.13]).

conclusionsThese analyses suggest that momentary symptom data can be useful for developing new PROs that reflect symptom experience other than the mean. They highlight knowledge gleaned from real-time studies, which deepens our understanding of symptoms by demonstrating which changes in symptoms are associated with overall perceived change.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental RecallMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22582336
PMCPMC8958633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.