Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22582332›Full record

ReviewPsychosomatic medicine2012

Ambulatory monitoring in the genetics of psychosomatic medicine.

Patrick H Finan, Howard Tennen, Felix Thoemmes, Alex J Zautra, Mary C Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychosomatic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Oxytocin Receptor Gene (Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ambulatory assessment.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick H FinanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Howard Tennen
Felix Thoemmes
Alex J Zautra
Mary C Davis

Funding

Vulnerabilities for coping-related drinking among post-college young adultsP60AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HESSELBROCK, VICTOR M · 2008 to 2017
$17.5M
Novel Methods to Study Substance Use in College StudentsR21AA017584 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI COVAULT, JONATHAN M · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS 1R21-AA017584NIAAA NIH HHS 5P60-AA003510NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA003510NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA017584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychosomatic disorders are composed of an array of psychological, biologic, and environmental features. The existing evidence points to a role for genetic factors in explaining individual differences in the development and maintenance of a variety of disorders, but studies to date have not shown consistent and replicable effects. As such, the attempt to uncover individual differences in the expression of psychosomatic disorders as a function of genetic architecture requires careful attention to their phenotypic architecture or the various intermediate phenotypes that make up a heterogeneous disorder. Ambulatory monitoring offers a novel approach to measuring time-variant and situation-dependent intermediate phenotypes. Recent examples of the use of ambulatory monitoring in genetic studies of stress reactivity, chronic pain, alcohol use disorders, and psychosocial resilience are reviewed in an effort to highlight the benefits of ambulatory monitoring for genetic study designs.

Indexed as

Monitoring, AmbulatoryPsychosomatic MedicineResearch DesignSelf ReportAlcoholismGenetic Association StudiesHumansIndividualityPain PerceptionPhenotypePsychophysiologic DisordersResilience, PsychologicalStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID22582332
PMCPMC4564065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.