ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2012
Cancer patients' experiences of using an Interactive Health Communication Application (IHCA).
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Pooled it
- Patients' views on the effectiveness of patient-held records: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- Improving symptom communication through personal digital assistants: the CHAT (Communicating Health Assisted by Technology) project.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013Trial
- How user characteristics affect use patterns in web-based illness management support for patients with breast and prostate cancer.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Trial
- A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Identify Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service in Five Settings: A Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Article
- Supporting cancer patients in illness management: usability evaluation of a mobile app.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2014Article
- Patients' reported reasons for non-use of an internet-based patient-provider communication service: qualitative interview study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactive Health Communication Applications (IHCAs) are increasingly used in health care. Studies document that IHCAs provide patients with knowledge and social support, enhance self- efficacy and can improve behavioural and clinical outcomes. However, research exploring patients' experiences of using IHCAs has been scarce. The aim of this study was to explore cancer patients' perspectives and experiences related to the use of an IHCA called WebChoice in their homes. Qualitative interviews were conducted with infrequent, medium and frequent IHCA users-six women and four men with breast and prostate cancer. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed inspired by interactionistic perspectives. We found that some patients' perceived WebChoice as a "friend," others as a "stranger." Access to WebChoice stimulated particularly high frequency users to position themselves as "information seeking agents," assuming an active patient role. However, to position oneself as an "active patient" was ambiguous and emotional. Feelings of "calmness", "normalization of symptoms", feelings of "being part of a community", feeling "upset" and "vulnerable", as well as "feeling supported" were identified. Interaction with WebChoice implied for some users an increased focus on illness. Our findings indicate that the interaction between patients and an IHCA such as WebChoice occurs in a variety of ways, some of which are ambivalent or conflicting. Particularly for frequent and medium frequency users, it offers support, but may at the same time reinforce an element of uncertainty in their life. Such insights should be taken into consideration in the future development of IHCAs in healthcare in general and in particular for implementation into patients' private sphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.