ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2012
Efficacy and safety of switching to travoprost/timolol fixed-combination therapy from latanoprost monotherapy.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in adherence and associated factors among patients on newly introduced prostaglandin analog and timolol fixed-combination therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy to Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Combination Therapy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- The signs of ocular-surface disorders after switching from latanoprost to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination: a prospective study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching Latanoprost Monotherapy to Bimatoprost Monotherapy or Combination of Brinzolamide and Latanoprost.The open ophthalmology journal · 2016Article
- Comparison between bimatoprost and latanoprost-timolol fixed combination for efficacy and safety after switching patients from latanoprost.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Article
- Effect on intraocular pressure of switching from latanoprost and travoprost monotherapy to timolol fixed combinations in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Persistence with topical glaucoma therapy among newly diagnosed Japanese patients.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Recovery from deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus after switching from bimatoprost to latanoprost.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo prospectively assess the efficacy of switching to a travoprost/timolol fixed-combination (TTFC) therapy from latanoprost monotherapy.
methodsThis was a prospective, open-label study in which patients with either primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had been undergoing latanoprost monotherapy for at least 3 months were enrolled. Baseline was defined as the time when the subjects were started on latanoprost monotherapy. Examination periods were defined as 1, 2, and 3 months the switch to TTFC therapy, and 1-2 months after the switch back to latanoprost monotherapy. The parameters examined were intraocular pressure (IOP), conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal erosion, as well as blood pressure and heart rate. A survey was conducted 1 and 3 months after the switch to TTFC therapy with a focus on each subject's impressions.
resultsAmong the 70 enrolled subjects, the 58 (29 men, 29 women) who completed the protocol were analyzed. The IOP before and at 1, 2, and 3 months after the switch to TTFC therapy was measured and again after the switch back to latanoprost monotherapy. The results indicated that TTFC therapy significantly reduced the IOP (P < 0.001) and significantly decreased the heart rate, but it did not significantly change either the systolic or diastolic blood pressure. TTFC therapy also did not significantly change either the conjunctival hyperemia or corneal erosion. In the questionnaire, the patients indicated that their impression was that there was no significant difference between the two ophthalmic solutions.
conclusionsCompared to latanoprost monotherapy, TTFC therapy significantly reduced IOP and decreased the heart rate in the patient cohort. No differences were found in terms of patients' impressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.