Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22581450›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2012

Differential BDNF responses of triple versus dual reuptake inhibition in neuronal and astrocytoma cells as well as in rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.

Jos Prickaerts, Jochen De Vry, Janneke Boere, Gunter Kenis, Maria S Quinton, Sharon Engel, Larry Melnick, Rudy Schreiber

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jos PrickaertsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jos.prickaerts@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Jochen De Vry
Janneke Boere
Gunter Kenis
Maria S Quinton
Sharon Engel
Larry Melnick
Rudy Schreiber
Sunovion (United States) · USEuropean Graduate School of Neuroscience · NLMaastricht University · NLEvotec (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoamine reuptake inhibitors increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) activity, and this growth factor is regarded as an interesting target for developing new antidepressant drugs. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether monoaminergic reuptake inhibition increases BDNF in vivo and in vitro as predicted by the neurotrophic hypothesis of depression, and whether triple reuptake inhibition has a superior BDNF response compared to dual reuptake inhibition. Twenty-one days of oral treatment (30 mg/kg) with the dual serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor duloxetine or the triple serotonin/noradrenaline/dopamine reuptake inhibitor DOV 216,303 restored BDNF protein levels in the rat hippocampus, which were initially decreased due to injection stress. The prefrontal cortex contained increased BDNF levels only after DOV 216,303 treatment. In vitro, neither duloxetine nor DOV 216,303 altered intracellular BDNF levels in murine HT22 neuronal cells. In contrast, BDNF release was more effectively decreased following treatment with DOV 216,303 in these cells. In rat C62B astrocytomas, both antidepressants increased intracellular BDNF levels at their highest nontoxic concentration. C62B astrocytomas did not release BDNF, even after antidepressant treatment. Increased BDNF levels support the neurotrophic hypothesis of depression, but our findings do not clearly evidence that the BDNF response after triple reuptake inhibitors is more effective than after dual reuptake inhibitors. Moreover, the data suggest that the role of BDNF in neurons and astrocytes is complex and likely depends on factors including specificity of cell types in different brain regions, cell-cell interactions, and different mechanisms of action of antidepressants used.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive AgentsAstrocytesAstrocytomaAza CompoundsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBrain NeoplasmsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCell Line, TumorDepressive DisorderDuloxetine HydrochlorideHippocampusMaleMiceNeuronsNeurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-azabicyclo-(3.1.0)hexane hydrochlorideAntidepressive AgentsAza CompoundsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDuloxetine HydrochlorideNeurotransmitter Uptake InhibitorsThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID22581450
PMCPMC3413810
OpenAlexW1983217712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.