Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22581306›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2012

Autologous cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in lung cancer: a phase II clinical study.

Runmei Li, Changli Wang, Liang Liu, Chunjuan Du, Shui Cao, Jinpu Yu, Shizhen Emily Wang, Xishan Hao, Xiubao Ren, Hui Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02621333 (Chemotherapy Combined Autologous Cytokine-induced Killer Cells in Naive Stage IV EGFR-wild Type Lung Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02621333 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Chemotherapy Combined Autologous Cytokine-induced Killer Cells in Naive Stage IV EGFR-wild Type Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective, Randomised, Open, Multicenter Phase Ⅱ Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenan Cancer HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled280ConditionsLung AdenocarcinomaArmsCIK, chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Adoptive cell therapies in thoracic malignancies.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Runmei LiDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu Xi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Changli Wang
Liang Liu
Chunjuan Du
Shui Cao
Jinpu Yu
Shizhen Emily Wang
Xishan Hao
Xiubao Ren
Hui Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells have the ability to kill tumor in vitro and in vivo. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of CIK cell immunotherapy following regular chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery.

methodsA paired study, with 87 stage I-IV NSCLC patients in each group, was performed. Patients received either chemotherapy (arm 2) or chemotherapy in combination with autologous CIK cell immunotherapy (arm 1). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

resultsOf the 87 paired patients, 50 had early-stage disease (stage I-IIIA) and 37 had advanced-stage disease (stage IIIB-IV). Among early-stage patients, the distribution of 3-year PFS rate and median PFS time showed no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.259 and 0.093, respectively); however, the 3-year OS rate and median OS time in arm 1 were significantly higher than those in arm 2 (82 vs. 66 %; p = 0.049 and 73 vs. 53 months; p = 0.006, respectively). Among the advanced-stage patients, the 3-year PFS and OS rates of arm 1 were significantly higher than those of arm 2 (6 vs. 3 %; p < 0.001 and 31 vs. 3 %; p < 0.001, respectively); the median PFS and OS times in arm 1 were also significantly longer than those in arm 2 (13 vs. 6 months; p = 0.001 and 24 vs. 10 months; p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that the frequency of CIK cell immunotherapy was significantly associated with prolonged PFS (HR = 0.91; 95 % CI 0.85-0.98; p = 0.012) and OS (HR = 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.74-0.93; p = 0.001) in the arm 1.

conclusionsThe data suggested that CIK cell immunotherapy could improve the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC patients, and increased frequency of CIK cell treatment could further enhance the beneficial effects. A multi-center randomized trial is being carried out in our hospital to further validate these findings.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCytokine-Induced Killer CellsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22581306
PMCPMC11028805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.