Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22581269›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2012

A finite element method to correct deformable image registration errors in low-contrast regions.

Hualiang Zhong, Jinkoo Kim, Haisen Li, Teamour Nurushev, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applicability and usage of dose mapping/accumulation in radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Biomechanical Modeling Guided CBCT Estimation Technique.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hualiang ZhongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA. hzhong1@hfhs.org
Jinkoo Kim
Haisen Li
Teamour Nurushev
Benjamin Movsas
Indrin J Chetty

Funding

To quantify deformable image registration errors in IGRTR01CA140341 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHONG, HUALIANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy requires deformable image registration to map radiation dose back and forth between images. The purpose of this study is to develop a novel method to improve the accuracy of an intensity-based image registration algorithm in low-contrast regions. A computational framework has been developed in this study to improve the quality of the 'demons' registration. For each voxel in the registration's target image, the standard deviation of image intensity in a neighborhood of this voxel was calculated. A mask for high-contrast regions was generated based on their standard deviations. In the masked regions, a tetrahedral mesh was refined recursively so that a sufficient number of tetrahedral nodes in these regions can be selected as driving nodes. An elastic system driven by the displacements of the selected nodes was formulated using a finite element method (FEM) and implemented on the refined mesh. The displacements of these driving nodes were generated with the 'demons' algorithm. The solution of the system was derived using a conjugated gradient method, and interpolated to generate a displacement vector field for the registered images. The FEM correction method was compared with the 'demons' algorithm on the computed tomography (CT) images of lung and prostate patients. The performance of the FEM correction relating to the 'demons' registration was analyzed based on the physical property of their deformation maps, and quantitatively evaluated through a benchmark model developed specifically for this study. Compared to the benchmark model, the 'demons' registration has the maximum error of 1.2 cm, which can be corrected by the FEM to 0.4 cm, and the average error of the 'demons' registration is reduced from 0.17 to 0.11 cm. For the CT images of lung and prostate patients, the deformation maps generated by the 'demons' algorithm were found unrealistic at several places. In these places, the displacement differences between the 'demons' registrations and their FEM corrections were found in the range of 0.4 and 1.1 cm. The mesh refinement and FEM simulation were implemented in a single thread application which requires about 45 min of computation time on a 2.6 GHz computer. This study has demonstrated that the FEM can be integrated with intensity-based image registration algorithms to improve their registration accuracy, especially in low-contrast regions.

Indexed as

ArtifactsFinite Element AnalysisCone-Beam Computed TomographyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungMaleProstate

Identifiers

PMID22581269
PMCPMC3360965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.