ReviewDer Orthopade2012
[Minimally invasive anterior approach].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Pooled it
- A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Trial
- Does Body Mass Index (BMI) Affect the Reconstruction of Biomechanical Parameters in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) through the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Short stem hip arthroplasty via the minimally invasive direct anterior approach.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2021Article
- Function and activity after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to a healthy population.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- The Mayo conservative hip: complication analysis and management of the first 41 cases performed at a University level 1 department.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- The Wuerzburg procedure: the tensor fasciae latae perforator is a reliable anatomical landmark to clearly identify the Hueter interval when using the minimally-invasive direct anterior approach to the hip joint.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Article
- Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The minimally invasive direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) was first published in 1985. Since then the technique has been further improved and the indications have been extended. The approach utilizes the muscle gap between the tensor fasciae latae muscle on the lateral side and the sartorius muscle on the medial side. This muscle gap allows a direct and quick approach to the hip joint with good muscle preservation. During preparation of the femur the tensor fasciae latae muscle is at risk of being damaged. The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (NCFL) and its branches are also in danger of being damaged during skin incision and dissection of the subcutaneous tissue. In this article the technique, risks and current clinical results of THA using the minimally invasive direct anterior approach are described. The results from the literature, as well as own results are compared to the traditional transgluteal lateral Bauer approach and discussed. Reviewing the literature, special attention has been given to the incidence of NCFL lesions, damage of the tensor fasciae latae muscle and positioning of the cup. Especially for the latter, the general view is hindered in the minimally invasive technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22581149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.