Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22581121›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2012

Domain organization differences explain Bcr-Abl's preference for CrkL over CrkII.

Wojciech Jankowski, Tamjeed Saleh, Ming-Tao Pai, Ganapathy Sriram, Raymond B Birge, Charalampos G Kalodimos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wojciech JankowskiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Tamjeed Saleh
Ming-Tao Pai
Ganapathy Sriram
Raymond B Birge
Charalampos G Kalodimos
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Regulatory mechanisms of the Crk Adapter proteinR01GM080308 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KALODIMOS, CHARALAMPOS · 2007 to 2015
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM80308NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CrkL is a key signaling protein that mediates the leukemogenic activity of Bcr-Abl. CrkL is thought to adopt a structure that is similar to that of its CrkII homolog. The two proteins share high sequence identity and indistinguishable ligand binding preferences, yet they have distinct physiological roles. Here we show that the structures of CrkL and phosphorylated CrkL are markedly different than the corresponding structures of CrkII. As a result, the binding activities of the Src homology 2 and Src homology 3 domains in the two proteins are regulated in a distinct manner and to a different extent. The different structural architecture of CrkL and CrkII may account for their distinct functional roles. The data show that CrkL forms a constitutive complex with Abl, thus explaining the strong preference of Bcr-Abl for CrkL. The results also highlight how the structural organization of the modular domains in adaptor proteins can control signaling outcome.

Indexed as

src Homology DomainsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBinding SitesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-crkSignal TransductionAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCRKL proteinFusion Proteins, bcr-ablNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-crk

Identifiers

PMID22581121
PMCPMC3423979
OpenAlexW2117484287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.