Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22581015›Full record

GuidelineSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Psychosocial health care needs assessment of adult cancer patients: a consensus-based guideline.

D Howell, S Mayo, S Currie, G Jones, M Boyle, T Hack, E Green, L Hoffman, V Collacutt, D McLeod and 3 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Pan-Canadian practice guideline: prevention, screening, assessment, and treatment of sleep disturbances in adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychosocial and supportive care needs of individuals with advanced myeloma.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  11. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The development and implementation of the After Cancer Treatment Transition (ACTT) Program for survivors of cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  14. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  15. How do radiation therapists detect and manage patients experiencing anxiety in the radiation oncology setting? A vignette study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Feasibility of implementing a cervix cancer-specific patient-reported outcome measure in routine ambulatory clinics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Immediate post-treatment supportive care needs of patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

D HowellUniversity Health Network (Princess Margaret Hospital), Toronto, ON, Canada. doris.howell@uhn.on.ca
S Mayo
S Currie
G Jones
M Boyle
T Hack
E Green
L Hoffman
V Collacutt
D McLeod
J Simpson
Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO)
Cancer Journey Action Group of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC)
Alberta Health Services · CABC Cancer Agency · CACancerCare Manitoba · CACancer Care Nova Scotia · CACancer Care Ontario · CACanmore Museum and Geoscience Centre · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough recommended as an essential part of cancer care, there is limited evidence regarding the optimum approach to psychosocial health care needs assessment in this setting. To address this gap, the Cancer Journey Action Group of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO) partnered to develop consensus-based recommendations regarding the routine assessment of psychosocial and supportive care needs. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the evidence that informed the guideline and disseminate the recommendations developed by the expert panel.

methodsClinical practice recommendations were developed by a panel comprised of psychosocial and interdisciplinary experts. Recommendations were informed by a review of oncology clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary research, through to May 2008. Following expert consensus on the recommendations, the clinical practice guideline was externally reviewed by a purposively selected sample of national and international interdisciplinary experts.

resultsA total of nine clinical practice guidelines, three systematic reviews, and 14 primary studies were included in the review. Overall, this body of literature suggested that routine collection of psychosocial health care data has an influence on communication with oncologists and other study specific outcomes, but the evidence was limited by heterogeneity and methodological limitations. Based on the interpretation of this body of evidence by clinical experts, research methodologists, and external reviewers, 12 substantive recommendations were developed regarding the process and parameters of psychosocial needs assessment in adult cancer patients.

conclusionGiven the limitations in the current body of evidence, there remains a need for rigorous empirical research regarding the optimal approach to psychosocial needs assessment, including the specific characteristics that influence effectiveness on patient outcomes. This guideline fills an important gap in psychosocial care, regarding the routine assessment of psychosocial health care needs.

Indexed as

Health ServicesMedical OncologyMental Health ServicesNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsAdultCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID22581015
OpenAlexW2091233009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.