Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22580901›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2012

Voiding urosonography including urethrosonography: high-quality examinations with an optimised procedure using a second-generation US contrast agent.

Carmina Duran, Javier del Riego, Luis Riera, Cesar Martin, Carlos Serrano, Pau Palaña

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmina DuranDepartment of Radiology, UDIAT-Centre Diagnòstic, Institut Universitari Parc Taulí-UAB, Parc Taulí, Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain. cduran@tauli.cat
Javier del Riego
Luis Riera
Cesar Martin
Carlos Serrano
Pau Palaña
Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVoiding urosonography (VUS) is established as a technique for detecting vesicoureteral reflux in children.

objectiveTo evaluate the quality of images of the entire urinary tract when using a second-generation US contrast agent and a modified VUS technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated 307 VUS examinations performed using SonoVue® in 591 pelvi-ureter units in 295 children of mean age, 27.1 (S.D., 42.5) months, with 154 (50.2%) of the examinations performed in boys; 58 children also underwent VUS using Levovist®. Three criteria were used for quality assessment of the bladder image: (1) progressive incorporation of contrast material in the bladder, (2) homogeneous bladder-filling to maximum capacity, and (3) visualisation of the posterior bladder wall.

resultsCriterion 1 was fulfilled in 305 (99.3%), criterion 2 in 304 (99%) and criterion 3 in 304 (99%) studies. In children who underwent VUS with both contrast agents, the concordance between the two techniques was moderate for findings in the bladder (Cohen K = 0.487; P < 0001) and perfect for findings in the male urethra.

conclusionBy a modified technique we obtained high-quality images of the bladder with the second-generation contrast agent.

Indexed as

PolysaccharidesUrinationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage EnhancementInfantInfant, NewbornMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyUrethraContrast MediaPolysaccharidesSHU 508

Identifiers

PMID22580901
OpenAlexW2080457621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.