ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012
Prognostic value of tumor growth factor levels during chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of miRNA/FGFR2 Axis in Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Ovarian recurrence risk assessment using machine learning, clinical information, and serum protein levels to predict survival in high grade ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Pre-Metastatic Niche: From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Application.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Expression of VEGF, EGF and HGF in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Tumor Microenvironment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Arbitrator in Patients' Outcome.Cancers · 2021Review
- PDGFRα expression as a novel therapeutic marker in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.Cancer biology & therapy · 2019Article
- High levels of serum platelet-derived growth factor-AA and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 are predictors of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Combining bevacizumab and chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Translational results of the AXEBeam trial.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Cytokeratin 5/6, c-Met expressions, and PTEN loss prognostic indicators in triple-negative breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Article
- Serial measurements of serum PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, FGF2, and VEGF in multiresistant ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.Journal of ovarian research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor growth and angiogenic factors are usually overexpressed in colorectal carcinomas. We aimed to assess the prognostic role of VEGF, bFGF, PDGF-AA, EGF, HGF, and E-selectin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) chemotherapy protocol. Thirty-eight colorectal cancer patients who had evidence of distant metastasis were enrolled in the study. Angiogenic factors were measured before and after third cycle of chemotherapy. Patients were randomized into three groups, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) groups, according to their clinical and radiologic evaluation after three cycles of XELOX chemotherapy. Eighteen patients (47.3 %) achieved partial response, 10 (26.3 %) stable disease, and 10 (26.3 %) progressive disease. VEGF (63.20 Pg/ml vs. 19,79 Pg/ml; p < 0.001), EGF (7.29 ± 3.08 Pg/ml vs. 4.79 ± 2.05 Pg/ml; p < 0.011), HGF (618.16 ± 340.39 Pg/ml vs. 452.02 ± 217.18 Pg/ml; p < 0.049), and PDGF-AA (691.68 ± 187.10 Pg/ml vs. 404.89 ± 168.47 Pg/ml; p < 0.001) were significantly decreased in PR group. PDGF-AA levels were also decreased in SD group (706.66 ± 206.66 Pg/ml vs. 389.79 ± 143.16 Pg/ml; p < 0,001). HGF levels were significantly increased in PD disease group (449.99 Pg/ml vs. 682.22 Pg/ml; p < 0.046). The baseline E-selectin levels were inversely proportional with overall survival that could be an important prognostic factor at the time of diagnosis. This study demonstrated that tumor growth factors can be helpful to determine colorectal cancer prognosis and overall survival in patients with metastatic disease. VEGF, HGF, EGF, and PDGF-AA levels were decreased in PR group. However, meaningful increment was seen HGF levels in PD group. Angiogenic factors and E-selectin provided unique prognostic information in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.