ArticleLa Radiologia medica2012
Acute stroke treatment using the Penumbra endovascular mechanical thrombolysis device: a single-centre experience.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is meant by "TICI"?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIschaemic stroke due to occlusion of large cerebral vessels has a poor prognosis. The clinical outcome is related to efficacy and timing of recanalisation of the occluded arteries. We report our experience with a thrombus aspiration device (Penumbra), and focus on pre- and postprocedural management. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 18 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to the occlusion of large cerebral vessels who were treated with mechanical thrombolysis at our centre between September 2009 and July 2010. Preprocedural symptoms were quantified using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Mechanical thrombolysis was performed with the Penumbra system. Intravenous thrombolysis was done only if <3 h had elapsed since symptom onset. Associated vessel stenoses were treated with stenting. All patients underwent neurological examination and postprocedural magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 and 6 months.
resultsMechanical thrombolysis using the Penumbra system was performed in all cases. A total of 83% of treated vessels had a value of 2/3 according to the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale. In seven patients (39%) intravenous thrombolysis was unsuccessful, and salvage mechanical thrombolysis followed. Three patients died after the procedure (16.7%). Five patients (27.8%) required a stenting procedure. All patients reported a significant improvement in symptoms (mean baseline NIHSS 19.6±5.6; mean postprocedural NIHSS, 7.8±5.5 p<0.0001)
conclusionsOur preliminary experience with the Penumbra mechanical thrombolysis system confirms previously reported results showing the efficacy and safety of the device in treating acute stroke caused by the occlusion of large intracranial vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.