Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22580613›Full record

ReviewOncogene2013

On the TRAIL to successful cancer therapy? Predicting and counteracting resistance against TRAIL-based therapeutics.

L Y Dimberg, C K Anderson, R Camidge, K Behbakht, A Thorburn, H L Ford

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. TRAIL and its receptors in cardiac diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L Y DimbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
C K Anderson
R Camidge
K Behbakht
A Thorburn
H L Ford

Funding

TRAIL Receptor Signaling in Human TumorsR01CA124545 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BEHBAKHT, KIAN, FORD, HEIDE L. · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA124545NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and agonistic antibodies against TRAIL death receptors (DR) kill tumor cells while causing virtually no damage to normal cells. Several novel drugs targeting TRAIL receptors are currently in clinical trials. However, TRAIL resistance is a common obstacle in TRAIL-based therapy and limits the efficiency of these drugs. In this review article we discuss different mechanisms of TRAIL resistance, and how they can be predicted and therapeutically circumvented. In addition, we provide a brief overview of all TRAIL-based clinical trials conducted so far. It is apparent that although the effects of TRAIL therapy are disappointingly modest overall, a small subset of patients responds very well to TRAIL. We argue that the true potential of targeting TRAIL DRs in cancer can only be reached when we find efficient ways to select for those patients that are most likely to benefit from the treatment. To achieve this, it is crucial to identify biomarkers that can help us predict TRAIL sensitivity.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsPrognosisSignal TransductionTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTreatment OutcomeTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

Identifiers

PMID22580613
PMCPMC4502956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.