Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22580232›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2012

Isolation rearing as a preclinical model of attention/deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

Justin R Yates, Mahesh Darna, Cassandra D Gipson, Linda P Dwoskin, Michael T Bardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin R YatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Mahesh Darna
Cassandra D Gipson
Linda P Dwoskin
Michael T Bardo
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MILICH, RICHARD · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF ADDICTION-RELATED BEHAVIORR01DA011716 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KANTAK, KATHLEEN M. · 1998 to 2013
$4.8M
Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
NOVELTY, DOPAMINE AND RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINER01DA012964 · NIDA · YAUPON THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 2000 to 2013
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA05312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA11716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA12964NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rats raised in an isolated condition (IC) are impulsive and hyperactive compared to rats raised in an enriched condition (EC), suggesting that isolation rearing may be a preclinical model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The current study determined if administration of methylphenidate (MPH), a dopamine transporter (DAT) blocker used in the treatment of ADHD, reduces the hyperactivity observed in IC rats toward levels observed in EC rats. Another goal was to determine if chronic MPH treatment differentially alters DAT function in EC and IC rats in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) or orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). IC and EC rats were treated with either MPH (1.5 mg/kg, p.o.) or vehicle from postnatal days (PND) 28-51. On PND 28 and 51, rats were evaluated for MPH-induced locomotor activity. On PND 55-63, in vitro [(3)H]DA uptake assays were performed in mPFC and OFC. At both PND 28 and 51, IC rats were hyperactive compared to EC rats. At PND 28, MPH increased activity in EC rats only. At PND 51, MPH did not alter locomotor activity in IC or EC rats. Beginning at PND 55, basal uptake of [(3)H]dopamine in IC rats was higher in mPFC and lower in OFC compared to EC rats. The basal differences in DAT function were normalized by MPH treatment in mPFC, but not in OFC. These findings suggest that isolation rearing may not represent a valid predictive model for screening effective medications in the treatment of hyperactivity associated with ADHD.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBody WeightCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineMaleMethylphenidateMotor ActivityPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySocial IsolationCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineMethylphenidateTritium

Identifiers

PMID22580232
PMCPMC3676298
OpenAlexW2085003408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.