Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22579509›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2012

Using attentional bias modification as a cognitive vaccine against depression.

Michael Browning, Emily A Holmes, Matthew Charles, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05415306 (An Emoji-based Attention Bias Modification Intervention for Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05415306 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Emoji-based Attention Bias Modification Intervention for Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDepressive Symptoms, Mood DisordersArmsAttention Bias Modification, Deep-breathing training, Sham Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Attentional bias training in girls at risk for depression.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2016
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. michael.browning@psych.ox.ac.uk
Emily A Holmes
Matthew Charles
Philip J Cowen
Catherine J Harmer

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701672Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1Wellcome Trust WT088217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative attentional biases are thought to increase the risk of recurrence in depression, suggesting that reduction of such biases may be a plausible strategy in the secondary prevention of the illness. However, no previous study has tested whether reducing negative attentional bias causally affects risk factors for depressive recurrence. The current experimental medicine study reports the effects of a computerized attentional bias modification (ABM) procedure on intermediate measures of the risk of depressive recurrence (residual depressive symptoms and the cortisol awakening response) in patients with recurrent depression.

methodsSixty-one patients with at least two previous episodes of depression who were currently in remission were randomized to receive either an active (positive) or placebo computer-based ABM regime. The ABM regime presented either pictures of faces or words. Residual depressive symptoms, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory and the cortisol awakening response were measured immediately before and after completion of the bias modification and then again after 4 weeks' follow-up.

resultsPositive, face-based ABM reduced both measures of recurrence risk (Beck Depression Inventory and cortisol awakening response). This effect occurred during the month following completion of bias modification. Word-based modification did not influence the outcome measures.

conclusionsPositive face-based ABM was able to reduce intermediate measures of recurrence risk in previously depressed patients. These results suggest that ABM may provide a "cognitive vaccine" against depression and offer a useful strategy in the secondary prevention of the illness.

Indexed as

AttentionBiasAdultAnalysis of VarianceCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrocortisoneMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSecondary PreventionYoung AdultHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID22579509
PMCPMC3504298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.