ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2012
Reassessment of the pharmacology of Sphingosine-1-phosphate S1P3 receptor ligands using the DiscoveRx PathHunter™ and Ca2+ release functional assays.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- S1P receptor modulators and the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system in multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2022Review
- Review
- Sphingosine 1-phosphate enhances the excitability of rat sensory neurons through activation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors 1 and/or 3.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2015Article
- Investigating the molecular mechanisms through which FTY720-P causes persistent S1P1 receptor internalization.British journal of pharmacology · 2014Article
- Detailed analysis of biased histamine H₄ receptor signalling by JNJ 7777120 analogues.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDiscoverRx's PathHunter™ assay measures GPCR agonist potency, via the recruitment of β-arrestin, independent of the subtype of G(α) protein activated. This assay is frequently used in drug discovery although little is known about the agonist pharmacology generated. Here we have compared agonist potency, efficacy and affinity values obtained in PathHunter™ assays with those from more established radioligand binding and functional techniques. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using cells expressing the human sphingosine-1-phosphate S1P(3) receptor at four different densities, we compared pharmacological affinity and efficacy values of four structurally distinct ligands - FTY720-P, VPC24191, CYM5442 and the endogenous agonist S1P - obtained from competition binding, functional Ca(2+) release and PathHunter™ assays. KEY
resultsThe pK(i) values for S1P were significantly different (9.34 ± 0.10 and 8.92 ± 0.15) in clones expressing different receptor levels using the binding assay. In the PathHunter™ and Ca(2+) assays, S1P and CYM5442 were full agonists, FTY720-P was a partial agonist, while the efficacy of VPC24191 could not be detected in PathHunter™ assays. VPC23019, previously described as a S1P(1/3) receptor antagonist, behaved as an S1P(3) receptor partial agonist in the Ca(2+) release assay. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Comparison of data from the PathHunter™ assay with binding and functional Ca(2+) assays suggest that PathHunter™ assays measured a different agonist-bound receptor conformation. While this assay has great utility in drug discovery, care must be taken as high-efficacy, low-affinity agonist compounds would not be detected. Therefore highly amplified, more traditional assays are necessary to identify agonists with low efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.