Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22577007›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2013

Mesenchymal stem cells for cardiac therapy: practical challenges and potential mechanisms.

Timothy J Cashman, Valerie Gouon-Evans, Kevin D Costa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. c-kitStem cell reviews and reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy J CashmanCardiovascular Cell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Valerie Gouon-Evans
Kevin D Costa
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007280 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI BARON, MARGARET H · 1985 to 2021
$22.8M
Engineered Cardiac Niche Arrays for Exploring and Optimizing Stem Cell TherapiesR21HL095980 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI COSTA, KEVIN D · 2010 to 2011
$445k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL095980NHLBI NIH HHS R21-HL095980NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007280NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell based treatments for myocardial infarction have demonstrated efficacy in the laboratory and in phase I clinical trials, but the understanding of such therapies remains incomplete. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are classically defined as maintaining the ability to generate mesenchyme-derived cell types, namely adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteocytes. Recent evidence suggests these cells may in fact harbor much greater potency than originally realized, as several groups have found that MSCs can form cardiac lineage cells in vitro. Additionally, experimental coculture of MSCs with cardiomyocytes appears to improve contractile function of the latter. Bolstered by such findings, several clinical trials have begun to test MSC transplantation for improving post-infarct cardiac function in human patients. The results of these trials have been mixed, underscoring the need to develop a deeper understanding of the underlying stem cell biology. To help synthesize the breadth of studies on the topic, this paper discusses current challenges in the field of MSC cellular therapies for cardiac repair, including methods of cell delivery and the identification of molecular markers that accurately specify the therapeutically relevant mesenchymal cell types. The various possible mechanisms of MSC mediated cardiac improvement, including somatic reprogramming, transdifferentiation, paracrine signaling, and direct electrophysiological coupling are also reviewed. Finally, we consider the traditional cell culture microenvironment, and the promise of cardiac tissue engineering to provide biomimetic in vitro model systems to more faithfully investigate MSC biology, helping to safely and effectively translate exciting discoveries in the laboratory to meaningful therapies in the clinic.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell TransdifferentiationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacParacrine CommunicationTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID22577007
PMCPMC5868420
OpenAlexW2086359082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.