Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22576165›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

To differentiate or not--routes towards metastasis.

Thomas Brabletz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 372 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
372citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

372 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 624 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. RBMX2 linkseLife · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Effects ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

312 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas BrabletzDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. thomas.brabletz@uniklinik-freiburg.de
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why are many metastases differentiated? Invading and disseminating carcinoma cells can undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is associated with a gain of stem cell-like behaviour. Therefore, EMT has been linked to the cancer stem cell concept. However, it is a matter of debate how subsequent mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) fits into the metastatic process and whether a MET is essential. In this Opinion article, I propose two principle types of metastatic progression: phenotypic plasticity involving transient EMT-MET processes and intrinsic genetic alterations keeping cells in an EMT and stemness state. This simplified classification integrates clinically relevant aspects of dormancy, metastatic tropism and therapy resistance, and implies perspectives on treatment strategies against metastasis.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22576165
OpenAlexW2111564953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.