Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22576162›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

Killing a cancer: what are the alternatives?

Peter Kreuzaler, Christine J Watson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The role of lysosome in regulated necrosis.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter KreuzalerUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Pathology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
Christine J Watson

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0900980Medical Research Council MR/J001023/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evading programmed cell death is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Conversely, inducing cell death by pharmacological means is the basis of almost every non-invasive cancer therapy. Research over the past decade has greatly increased our understanding of non-apoptotic programmed cell death events, such as lysosomal-mediated cell death, necroptosis and cell death with autophagy. It is becoming clear that an intricate effector network connects many of these classical and non-classical death pathways. In this Review, we discuss converging and diverging features of these pathways, as well as attempts to exploit this newly gained knowledge pharmacologically to provide therapeutics for cancer.

Indexed as

AutophagyCell DeathHumansLysosomesNecrosisNeoplasmsReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22576162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.