Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22574976›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2012

Breaking the barrier in stroke: what should we know? A mini-review.

Cesar V Borlongan, Antonio A Rodrigues, Maria Carolina Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Could the Gut Microbiota Serve as a Therapeutic Target in Ischemic Stroke?Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cesar V BorlonganDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33612 USA. cborlong@health.usf.edu
Antonio A Rodrigues
Maria Carolina Oliveira
University of South Florida · US

Funding

Blood-Brain Barrier Repair in Cell Therapy for StrokeR01NS071956 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V, GARBUZOVA-DAVIS, SVITLANA NICOLAI · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071956NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071956-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been considered as an important regulator of brain homeostasis, and its disturbance has been implicated in the onset and/or evolution of many pathological manifestations of neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases [1, 2]. In particular, BBB breakdown has been closely associated with the primary insult, as well as the secondary cell death of stroke. Here, we review the pioneering contributions of leading scientists who have vested interest in advancing our understanding of the pivotal role of BBB in stroke, but also exploiting this knowledge in developing novel BBB-based therapeutic regimens to abrogate stroke symptoms. The study of BBB as a fundamental research theme and as a target for clinical applications in stroke can be approached in three main themes namely, basic science research, translational and clinical research, and emerging therapies for BBB repair in stroke. This minireview captures cutting-edge discoveries establishing BBB as a central target for abetting neuroprotection and neurorestoration in stroke.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierHumansStrokeTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID22574976
PMCPMC3411908
OpenAlexW1967280698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.