ArticleMycoses2013
Diagnosis and inflammatory response of patients with candiduria.
Article in Mycoses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Candiduria! What now? : Therapy of urinary tract infections with Candida].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Trial
- Analytical validation of a highly accurate and reliable next-generation sequencing-based urine assay.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance of Uropathogens Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A New Gold Rush: A Review of Current and Developing Diagnostic Tools for Urinary Tract Infections.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans.Central European journal of urology · 2015Review
- Rat indwelling urinary catheter model of Candida albicans biofilm infection.Infection and immunity · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Candiduria is common in hospitalised patients, but the clinical relevance is still unclear. This study was done to further our knowledge on detection of and host responses to candiduria. Urines and clinical data from 136 patients in whom presence of yeast was diagnosed by microscopic urinalysis were collected. Diagnosis by standard urine culture methods on blood and MacConkey agar as well as on fungal culture medium (Sabouraud dextrose agar) was compared. Inflammatory parameters (IL-6 and IL-17, Ig) were quantified in the urine and compared with levels in control patients without candiduria. Standard urine culture methods detected only 37% of Candida spp. in urine. Sensitivity was especially low (23%) for C. glabrata and was independent of fungal burden. Candida specific IgG but not IgA was significantly elevated when compared with control patients (P < 0.0001 and 0.07 respectively). In addition, urine levels of IL-6 and IL-17 were significantly higher in candiduric patients when compared with control patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis documented an independent association between an increased IgG (odds ratio (OR) 136.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.7-719.2; P < 0.0001), an increased IL-17 (OR 17.4, 95% CI 5.3-57.0; P < 0.0001) and an increased IL-6 level (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.9-12.4; P = 0.001) and candiduria. In summary, our data indicate that clinical studies on candiduria should include fungal urine culture and that inflammatory parameters may be helpful to identify patients with clinically relevant candiduria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.