Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22574774›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2012

Renal stem cells: fact or science fiction?

Kristen K McCampbell, Rebecca A Wingert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Principles of Zebrafish Nephron Segment Development.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Intravenous administration of iPS-MSCJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nephron repair: powered by anaerobic energy metabolism.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nephrotoxin Microinjection in Zebrafish to Model Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen K McCampbellDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Rebecca A Wingert
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Identification of Kidney Regeneration Mechanisms Using the ZebrafishDP2OD008470 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI WINGERT, REBECCA ANN · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
Genetic Analysis of Pathways Controlling Nephron Segmentation Using the ZebrafishK01DK083512 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI WINGERT, REBECCA ANN · 2009 to 2013
$644k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK083512NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK083512NIH HHS DP2 OD008470NIH HHS DP2OD008470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidney is widely regarded as an organ without regenerative abilities. However, in recent years this dogma has been challenged on the basis of observations of kidney recovery following acute injury, and the identification of renal populations that demonstrate stem cell characteristics in various species. It is currently speculated that the human kidney can regenerate in some contexts, but the mechanisms of renal regeneration remain poorly understood. Numerous controversies surround the potency, behaviour and origins of the cell types that are proposed to perform kidney regeneration. The present review explores the current understanding of renal stem cells and kidney regeneration events, and examines the future challenges in using these insights to create new clinical treatments for kidney disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationRegenerationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22574774
PMCPMC3350370
OpenAlexW2167220389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.