ArticleBMC genomics2012
Unique core genomes of the bacterial family vibrionaceae: insights into niche adaptation and speciation.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- SURE-Pipe: a pipeline to compare genomes and extract shared and unique regions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Yeast Pseudozyma hubeiensis potential for aflatoxin B1 decontamination and its genetic properties.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Adaptive Evolution ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Taxonomic, genomic, and ecological insights into a novel Flavobacteriaceae strain from coastal tidal flats.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Insights into virulence: structure classification of themSystems · 2023Article
- Sequencing and Characterization ofGenes · 2023Article
- Comparative Genomics of ThreeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Core and Accessory Genome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomics of 86 Whole-Genome Sequences in the Six Species of the Elizabethkingia Genus Reveals Intraspecific and Interspecific Divergence.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Pangenomic Definition of Prokaryotic Species and the Phylogenetic Structure ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Comparative Genomics of an Unusual Biogeographic Disjunction in the Cotton Tribe (Gossypieae) Yields Insights into Genome Downsizing.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- A genomic view of food-related and probiotic Enterococcus strains.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017Article
- Article
- Chromosome-specific sequencing reveals an extensive dispensable genome component in wheat.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Whole-genome comparative analysis of virulence genes unveils similarities and differences between endophytes and other symbiotic bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Complete genome determination and analysis of Acholeplasma oculi strain 19L, highlighting the loss of basic genetic features in the Acholeplasmataceae.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Insights into the maize pan-genome and pan-transcriptome.The Plant cell · 2014Article
- Evolution of pan-genomes of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., and Salmonella enterica.Journal of bacteriology · 2013Article
- Molecular characterization of cold adaptation of membrane proteins in the Vibrionaceae core-genome.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe criteria for defining bacterial species and even the concept of bacterial species itself are under debate, and the discussion is apparently intensifying as more genome sequence data is becoming available. However, it is still unclear how the new advances in genomics should be used most efficiently to address this question. In this study we identify genes that are common to any group of genomes in our dataset, to determine whether genes specific to a particular taxon exist and to investigate their potential role in adaptation of bacteria to their specific niche. These genes were named unique core genes. Additionally, we investigate the existence and importance of unique core genes that are found in isolates of phylogenetically non-coherent groups. These groups of isolates, that share a genetic feature without sharing a closest common ancestor, are termed genophyletic groups.
resultsThe bacterial family Vibrionaceae was used as the model, and we compiled and compared genome sequences of 64 different isolates. Using the software orthoMCL we determined clusters of homologous genes among the investigated genome sequences. We used multilocus sequence analysis to build a host phylogeny and mapped the numbers of unique core genes of all distinct groups of isolates onto the tree. The results show that unique core genes are more likely to be found in monophyletic groups of isolates. Genophyletic groups of isolates, in contrast, are less common especially for large groups of isolate. The subsequent annotation of unique core genes that are present in genophyletic groups indicate a high degree of horizontally transferred genes. Finally, the annotation of the unique core genes of Vibrio cholerae revealed genes involved in aerotaxis and biosynthesis of the iron-chelator vibriobactin.
conclusionThe presented work indicates that genes specific for any taxon inside the bacterial family Vibrionaceae exist. These unique core genes encode conserved metabolic functions that can shed light on the adaptation of a species to its ecological niche. Additionally, our study suggests that unique core genes can be used to aid classification of bacteria and contribute to a bacterial species definition on a genomic level. Furthermore, these genes may be of importance in clinical diagnostics and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.