Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22574281›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2012

Brain Circuits of Methamphetamine Place Reinforcement Learning: The Role of the Hippocampus-VTA Loop.

Yonas B Keleta, Joe L Martinez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prior novelty invigorates future mesolimbic target detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methamphetamine Dysregulation of the Central Nervous System and Peripheral Immunity.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Mutation inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. GABANeuropharmacology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genetic factors involved in risk for methamphetamine intake and sensitization.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yonas B KeletaUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249 USA.
Joe L Martinez
The University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

UTSA Maximizing Access to Research Careers Research Training Program - Admin SupplementT34GM007717 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI BAREA-RODRIGUEZ, EDWIN J · 1985 to 2021
$9.5M
MINORITY RESEARCH TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCET32MH018882 · NIMH · AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION · PI MARTINEZ, JOSEPH L. · 1987 to 2009
$8.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM007717NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reinforcing effects of addictive drugs including methamphetamine (METH) involve the midbrain ventral tegmental area (VTA). VTA is primary source of dopamine (DA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the ventral hippocampus (VHC). These three brain regions are functionally connected through the hippocampal-VTA loop that includes two main neural pathways: the bottom-up pathway and the top-down pathway. In this paper, we take the view that addiction is a learning process. Therefore, we tested the involvement of the hippocampus in reinforcement learning by studying conditioned place preference (CPP) learning by sequentially conditioning each of the three nuclei in either the bottom-up order of conditioning; VTA, then VHC, finally NAc, or the top-down order; VHC, then VTA, finally NAc. Following habituation, the rats underwent experimental modules consisting of two conditioning trials each followed by immediate testing (test 1 and test 2) and two additional tests 24 h (test 3) and/or 1 week following conditioning (test 4). The module was repeated three times for each nucleus. The results showed that METH, but not Ringer's, produced positive CPP following conditioning each brain area in the bottom-up order. In the top-down order, METH, but not Ringer's, produced either an aversive CPP or no learning effect following conditioning each nucleus of interest. In addition, METH place aversion was antagonized by coadministration of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK801, suggesting that the aversion learning was an NMDA receptor activation-dependent process. We conclude that the hippocampus is a critical structure in the reward circuit and hence suggest that the development of target-specific therapeutics for the control of addiction emphasizes on the hippocampus-VTA top-down connection.

Indexed as

Hippocampuslearning and memorynucleus accumbensplace conditioningrewardVTA

Identifiers

PMID22574281
PMCPMC3345357
OpenAlexW1954057881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.