Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22574192›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

ApicoAP: the first computational model for identifying apicoplast-targeted proteins in multiple species of Apicomplexa.

Gokcen Cilingir, Shira L Broschat, Audrey O T Lau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic analysis of pyrimidine biosynthetic enzymes inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. tRNA modifying enzymes MnmE and MnmG are essential forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative chemical genomics inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Plastid biogenesis in malaria parasites requires the interactions and catalytic activity of the Clp proteolytic system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prediction of Signal Peptides in Proteins from Malaria Parasites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  15. Heterologous expression inFEBS open bio · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  18. Genomics of apicomplexan parasites.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gokcen CilingirSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Shira L Broschat
Audrey O T Lau
Washington State University · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust GR075800M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost of the parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa contain a relict prokaryotic-derived plastid called the apicoplast. This organelle is important not only for the survival of the parasite, but its unique properties make it an ideal drug target. The majority of apicoplast-associated proteins are nuclear encoded and targeted post-translationally to the organellar lumen via a bipartite signaling mechanism that requires an N-terminal signal and transit peptide (TP). Attempts to define a consensus motif that universally identifies apicoplast TPs have failed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, we propose a generalized rule-based classification model to identify apicoplast-targeted proteins (ApicoTPs) that use a bipartite signaling mechanism. Given a training set specific to an organism, this model, called ApicoAP, incorporates a procedure based on a genetic algorithm to tailor a discriminating rule that exploits the known characteristics of ApicoTPs. Performance of ApicoAP is evaluated for four labeled datasets of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium yoelii, Babesia bovis, and Toxoplasma gondii proteins. ApicoAP improves the classification accuracy of the published dataset for P. falciparum to 94%, originally 90% using PlasmoAP. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We present a parametric model for ApicoTPs and a procedure to optimize the model parameters for a given training set. A major asset of this model is that it is customizable to different parasite genomes. The ApicoAP prediction software is available at http://code.google.com/p/apicoap/ and http://bcb.eecs.wsu.edu.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAlgorithmsApicomplexaComputational BiologyDiscriminant AnalysisPlastidsProtozoan ProteinsSpecies SpecificityProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22574192
PMCPMC3344922
OpenAlexW2069291487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.