Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22573885›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2012

Progressive sheet-to-tubule transformation is a general mechanism for endoplasmic reticulum partitioning in dividing mammalian cells.

Maija Puhka, Merja Joensuu, Helena Vihinen, Ilya Belevich, Eija Jokitalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mitotic spindle membranes.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A bird's-eye view of the endoplasmic reticulum in filamentous fungi.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  19. Multiscale biophysical analysis of nucleolus disassembly during mitosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maija PuhkaElectron Microscopy Unit, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Merja Joensuu
Helena Vihinen
Ilya Belevich
Eija Jokitalo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is both structurally and functionally complex, consisting of a dynamic network of interconnected sheets and tubules. To achieve a more comprehensive view of ER organization in interphase and mitotic cells and to address a discrepancy in the field (i.e., whether ER sheets persist, or are transformed to tubules, during mitosis), we analyzed the ER in four different mammalian cell lines using live-cell imaging, high-resolution electron microscopy, and three dimensional electron microscopy. In interphase cells, we found great variation in network organization and sheet structures among different cell lines. In mitotic cells, we show that the ER undergoes both spatial reorganization and structural transformation of sheets toward more fenestrated and tubular forms. However, the extent of spatial reorganization and sheet-to-tubule transformation varies among cell lines. Fenestration and tubulation of the ER correlates with a reduced number of membrane-bound ribosomes.

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsCell Line, TumorChlorocebus aethiopsCHO CellsCricetinaeEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansModels, BiologicalRibosomesTime-Lapse ImagingVero Cells

Identifiers

PMID22573885
PMCPMC3386207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.