Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22572545›Full record

GuidelineCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2012

Consensus report on the radiological management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): recommendations of the German GIST Imaging Working Group.

Janine Kalkmann, Martin Zeile, Gerald Antoch, Frank Berger, Stefan Diederich, Dietmar Dinter, Christian Fink, Rolf Janka, Jörg Stattaus, German GIST Imaging Working Group

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Optimizing surgical and imatinib therapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Case report: GermlineFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Low rectal GIST.BMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Metastatic pattern and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): a SEER-based analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janine KalkmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Martin Zeile
Gerald Antoch
Frank Berger
Stefan Diederich
Dietmar Dinter
Christian Fink
Rolf Janka
Jörg Stattaus
German GIST Imaging Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to reach consensus in imaging for staging and follow-up as well as for therapy response assessment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). The German GIST Imaging Working Group was formed by 9 radiologists engaged in assessing patients with GIST treated with targeted therapy. The following topics were discussed: indication and optimal acquisition techniques of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT; tumour response assessment considering response criteria and measurement techniques on CT, MRI and PET/CT; result interpretation; staging interval and pitfalls. Contrast-enhanced CT is the standard method for GIST imaging. MRI is the method of choice in case of liver-specific questions or contraindications to CT. PET/CT should be used for early response assessment or inconclusive results on morphologic imaging. All imaging techniques should be standardized allowing a reliable response assessment. Response has to be assessed with respect to lesion size, lesion density and appearance of new lesions. A critical issue is pseudoprogression due to myxoid degeneration or intratumoural haemorrhage. The management of patients with GIST receiving a targeted therapy requires a standardized algorithm for imaging and an appropriate response assessment with respect to changes in lesion size and density.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsArtifactsContraindicationsContrast MediaFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm StagingPelvic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID22572545
PMCPMC3362866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.