Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22571502›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2012

The oxygen uptake response to incremental ramp exercise: methodogical and physiological issues.

Jan Boone, Jan Bourgois

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Reliability and validity of the respiratory threshold method.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reliability and applicability of theEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan BooneDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Jan.boone@ugent.be
Jan Bourgois

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An incremental ramp exercise is a protocol that is frequently used in the domain of exercise testing to get an insight into the exercise tolerance of both healthy active populations (including athletes) and patients, due to the specific characteristics of the protocol. The continuous and linear increase in work rate is not only less strenuous for populations with a very low exercise capacity but it requires the aerobic metabolism to adapt to the continuously changing conditions. Therefore, this protocol can provide important information on the adaptive capacity of individuals to exercise in non-steady-state conditions. The ramp exercise has also been used in the past two decades to get an insight into the underlying mechanisms of the oxygen uptake (·VO₂) response (and kinetics) to exercise. Against the expectations, it has been shown that the parameters that quantify the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise do not completely correspond to those obtained from constant work-rate transitions and incremental step exercise. For that reason, it could be concluded that the ·VO₂ response is specific to ramp exercise, and thus is determined by other mechanisms than those which determine other protocols. Although the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise has a high level of reproducibility and a uniform pattern can be observed, especially for the ·VO₂ response below the gas exchange threshold (GET) [above the GET, the ·VO₂ response is less clear], some prudence is necessary when interpreting potential differences in the ·VO₂ response between populations. Several methodological issues (e.g. baseline work rate, ramp slope) exert an important impact on the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise. The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the methodological and physiological factors that have an impact on the ·VO₂ response to ramp exercise. It is of importance that exercise physiologists take these factors into consideration, not only prior to the conductance of the ramp exercise in a variety of subjects, but also when interpreting the obtained results.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignExerciseExercise TestHumansOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.