ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Sequence-specific targeting of dosage compensation in Drosophila favors an active chromatin context.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential chromatin looping regulated by two GA-binding transcription factors creates an X-specific chromatin environment for dosage compensation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Proteostasis failure and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to chromosomal instability-induced microcephaly.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dinucleotide preferences underlie apparent codon preference reversals in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Physical interaction between MSL2 and CLAMP assures direct cooperativity and prevents competition at composite binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Dosage Compensation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Shared evolutionary trajectories of three independent neo-sex chromosomes inGenome research · 2021Article
- The Influence of Chromosomal Environment on X-Linked Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Biophysical Review's 'meet the editors series'-a profile of Joshua W. K. Ho.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
- Factor cooperation for chromosome discrimination in Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Contingency in the convergent evolution of a regulatory network: Dosage compensation in Drosophila.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Gene-by-Gene or Localized Dosage Compensation on the Neo-X Chromosome in Drosophila miranda.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Chromosome-nuclear envelope attachments affect interphase chromosome territories and entanglement.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2018Article
- Article
- Enhanced chromatin accessibility of the dosage compensated Drosophila male X-chromosome requires the CLAMP zinc finger protein.PloS one · 2017Article
- Dosage Compensation in Drosophila-a Model for the Coordinate Regulation of Transcription.Genetics · 2016Review
- Article
- Histone H1-mediated epigenetic regulation controls germline stem cell self-renewal by modulating H4K16 acetylation.Nature communications · 2015Article
- High-Affinity Sites Form an Interaction Network to Facilitate Spreading of the MSL Complex across the X Chromosome in Drosophila.Molecular cell · 2015Article
- Dosage compensation in Drosophila.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015Review
- Decoding the complex genetic causes of heart diseases using systems biology.Biophysical reviews · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Drosophila MSL complex mediates dosage compensation by increasing transcription of the single X chromosome in males approximately two-fold. This is accomplished through recognition of the X chromosome and subsequent acetylation of histone H4K16 on X-linked genes. Initial binding to the X is thought to occur at "entry sites" that contain a consensus sequence motif ("MSL recognition element" or MRE). However, this motif is only ∼2 fold enriched on X, and only a fraction of the motifs on X are initially targeted. Here we ask whether chromatin context could distinguish between utilized and non-utilized copies of the motif, by comparing their relative enrichment for histone modifications and chromosomal proteins mapped in the modENCODE project. Through a comparative analysis of the chromatin features in male S2 cells (which contain MSL complex) and female Kc cells (which lack the complex), we find that the presence of active chromatin modifications, together with an elevated local GC content in the surrounding sequences, has strong predictive value for functional MSL entry sites, independent of MSL binding. We tested these sites for function in Kc cells by RNAi knockdown of Sxl, resulting in induction of MSL complex. We show that ectopic MSL expression in Kc cells leads to H4K16 acetylation around these sites and a relative increase in X chromosome transcription. Collectively, our results support a model in which a pre-existing active chromatin environment, coincident with H3K36me3, contributes to MSL entry site selection. The consequences of MSL targeting of the male X chromosome include increase in nucleosome lability, enrichment for H4K16 acetylation and JIL-1 kinase, and depletion of linker histone H1 on active X-linked genes. Our analysis can serve as a model for identifying chromatin and local sequence features that may contribute to selection of functional protein binding sites in the genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.